<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>InhouseBlog.com &#187; Litigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/tag/litigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com</link>
	<description>In-House Counsel News and Jobs Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 08:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pepsico sued by Pepsi inventor’s children</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/pepsico_sued/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/pepsico_sued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 03:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird/Wacky/Funny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=28376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The heirs of Richard Ritchie, who invented the formula for Pepsi-Cola more than 80 years ago, are suing Pepsico Inc., saying the soft drink and snack food maker has improperly interfered with their rights to their father’s invention.</p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Can&#8217;t wait to see Coca-Cola&#8217;s new ad campaign:</p>
<blockquote><p>The heirs of Richard Ritchie, who invented the formula for Pepsi-Cola more than 80 years ago, are suing Pepsico Inc., saying the soft drink and snack food maker has improperly interfered with their rights to their father’s invention.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[via: <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/2mYPSdSmxyM/pepsi-inventors-children-sue-pepsico" title="Pepsi inventor’s children sue PepsiCo">Pepsi inventor’s children sue PepsiCo</a> at InsideCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fpepsico_sued%2F&amp;title=Pepsico%20sued%20by%20Pepsi%20inventor%E2%80%99s%20children" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/pepsico_sued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conducting Internal Investigations and Separate Counsel for Employees</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/internal_investigations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/internal_investigations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 08:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=27860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A guide on whether your employees should have separate counsel</p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>A recent article at <em>InsideCounsel</em> discusses whether your employees should have separate counsel during internal investigations:</p>
<blockquote><p>At some point, almost every organization encounters questions of actual or suspected wrongdoing by its employees, officers or directors. When that scenario arises, it is time to launch an internal investigation to ferret out any wrongdoing and to take swift action to correct it.  For most employees, cooperation in an internal investigation is a required condition of their continued employment. However, if the suspected wrongdoing turns out to have been conducted by one or more employees, the investigation may lead to anything from disciplinary proceedings against employees to criminal charges. </p></blockquote>
<p>[via: <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/Dm90ymEU0Ew/litigation-how-to-conduct-internal-investigations" title="Litigation: How to conduct internal investigations">Litigation: How to conduct internal investigations</a> at InsideCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Finternal_investigations%2F&amp;title=Conducting%20Internal%20Investigations%20and%20Separate%20Counsel%20for%20Employees" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/internal_investigations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predictive Coding: Slashing that Litigation Budget by Training Your Computer (New York In-House Counsel Meetup, April 26, 2012, NYC, Free CLE)</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/predictive_coding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/predictive_coding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=27404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The New York In-House Counsel Meetup is having another free and interesting event on April 26, 2012 in New York City &#8211; this time it focuses on predictive coding. Did we mention free soft drinks, CLE and a wine and cheese reception afterwards? Also included &#8211; as well as the opportunity to network with like-minded [...]</p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The New York In-House Counsel Meetup is having another <a href="http://www.meetup.com/New-York-In-House-Counsel/events/59530122/" title="Predictive Coding - New York In-House Counsel Meetup" target="_blank">free and interesting event on April 26, 2012 in New York City</a> &#8211; this time it focuses on predictive coding.  Did we mention free soft drinks, CLE and a wine and cheese reception afterwards? Also included &#8211; as well as the opportunity to network with like-minded counsel based in your area.  Here is a little more about the presentation:</p>
<blockquote><p>Can a machine act intelligently?  For decades, this open question has confounded scientists and lay people alike.  But with recent technological advancements, the questions now are: can you train a computer to review your discovery documents?  And is reliance on the computer’s coding legally defensible? </p>
<p>Alan Winchester, Esq. of Harris Beach PLLC takes us on a fascinating tour through the world of predictive coding, statistical modeling, and recent case law on electronic discovery.  His initial focus will be on the recently decided Moore v. Publicis Group decision, where Magistrate Judge Gregory Peck of the Southern District of New York opined that computer assisted review is an acceptable way to search for documents.  This decision has profound implications: using predictive coding technology, law firms can use computers to prioritize documents by subject matter and responsiveness, and significantly decrease the amount of time reviewers spend coding documents.  </p>
<p>Less time reviewing, more time analyzing, more dollars saved.  But blind reliance on the statistical engine within the review software can lead to precarious situations.  Alan goes beyond the case law.  He teaches us how to create a defensible set of seed documents for training the review tool, so that the predictive coding engine produces statistically accurate results. </p>
<p>Yes, you can train your computer.</p>
<p>The program is eligible for one and a half (1 1/2) hours of New York Professional Practice CLE credit for both newly admitted and experienced attorneys.</p>
<p>Complimentary soft drinks will be available, and the firm will host a wine and cheese reception for attendees immediately following the presentation.</p>
<p>Our presenter, Alan Winchester, Esq., is a frequent speaker on electronic discovery and document management issues and a member of the Harris Beach PLLC firm. As a member of the firm, he is a leader of the e-info Electronic Information Counseling and Management Team, which provides comprehensive document management services for both transactional and litigation scenarios.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you are not already a member, <a href="http://www.meetup.com/New-York-In-House-Counsel/events/59530122/" title="Predictive Coding - New York In-House Counsel Meetup" target="_blank">join the New York In-House Counsel Meetup Group and sign up for the presentation today</a>.</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fpredictive_coding%2F&amp;title=Predictive%20Coding%3A%20Slashing%20that%20Litigation%20Budget%20by%20Training%20Your%20Computer%20%28New%20York%20In-House%20Counsel%20Meetup%2C%20April%2026%2C%202012%2C%20NYC%2C%20Free%20CLE%29" id="wpa2a_8"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/predictive_coding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In-House Counsel Face a Spike in Mergers and Acquisition Litigation</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/mergers_and_acquisition_litigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/mergers_and_acquisition_litigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate/Mergers and Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=26041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When in-house lawyers go shopping in mergers and acquisitions deals these days, they need to bring along not only a checkbook but also a strong team of litigators.</p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>When in-house lawyers go shopping in mergers and acquisitions deals these days, they need to bring along not only a checkbook but also a strong team of litigators.</p>
<p>[via: <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1332689550486&amp;rss=cc" title="In-House Counsel Face a Spike in M&#038;A Litigation">In-House Counsel Face a Spike in M&#038;A Litigation</a> at CorpCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fmergers_and_acquisition_litigation%2F&amp;title=In-House%20Counsel%20Face%20a%20Spike%20in%20Mergers%20and%20Acquisition%20Litigation" id="wpa2a_10"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/mergers_and_acquisition_litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/strangest_lawsuits-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/strangest_lawsuits-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird/Wacky/Funny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=25770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The following lawsuits exemplify the lighter, and sometimes bizarre, side of the legal world.</p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>More of the strangest lawsuits showing the lighter, and sometimes bizarre, side of the legal world.</p>
<p>[via: <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/K01EJtGbXaE/7-of-the-strangest-lawsuits-making-headlines" title="7 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines">7 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines</a> at InsideCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fstrangest_lawsuits-4%2F&amp;title=7%20of%20the%20strangest%20lawsuits%20making%20headlines" id="wpa2a_12"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/strangest_lawsuits-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An overview of state e-discovery rules</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/state_e-discovery_rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/state_e-discovery_rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=25363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When discovery first met the “e-“ that precedes it today, it fell upon trial judges nationwide to figure out how to harmonize primordial sources of electronically stored information (ESI) with traditional discovery rubrics—essentially, how to fit a round peg into a square hole.</p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>When discovery first met the “e-“ that precedes it today, it fell upon trial judges nationwide to figure out how to harmonize primordial sources of electronically stored information (ESI) with traditional discovery rubrics—essentially, how to fit a round peg into a square hole.</p>
<p>[via: <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/bamh-4INFgM/an-overview-of-state-e-discovery-rules" title="An overview of state e-discovery rules">An overview of state e-discovery rules</a> at InsideCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fstate_e-discovery_rules%2F&amp;title=An%20overview%20of%20state%20e-discovery%20rules" id="wpa2a_14"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/state_e-discovery_rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>100 Largest Jury Verdicts of 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/largest_jury_verdicts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/largest_jury_verdicts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=25246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A look at the 100 highest jury verdicts of 2011&#8212;including IP, toxic torts, product liability, and more&#8212;as reported by affiliate VerdictSearch based on its surveys of the nation's courts, reports from attorneys, and reporting by ALM Media LLC publications.</p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>If your company made the list of the 100 largest jury verdicts of 2011, InhouseBlog hopes you were the prevailing party:</p>
<blockquote><p>A look at the 100 highest jury verdicts of 2011&mdash;including IP, toxic torts, product liability, and more&mdash;as reported by affiliate VerdictSearch based on its surveys of the nation&#8217;s courts, reports from attorneys, and reporting by ALM Media LLC publications.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[via: <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1331492789480&amp;rss=cc" title="100 Largest Jury Verdicts of 2011">100 Largest Jury Verdicts of 2011</a> at CorpCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Flargest_jury_verdicts%2F&amp;title=100%20Largest%20Jury%20Verdicts%20of%202011" id="wpa2a_16"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/largest_jury_verdicts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In-House Counsel&#8217;s Guide to Crisis Management</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/crisis_management/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/crisis_management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=24445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While some companies crumble in the wake of disaster, others grow stronger as a result of the way they reacted. Understanding the common causes of crisis and best practices for responding can help in-house counsel guide a company through the minefield of media and public scrutiny that follows a catastrophe.</p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Crisis management &#8211; is your legal department up to speed and ready to react?</p>
<blockquote><p>While some companies crumble in the wake of disaster, others grow stronger as a result of the way they reacted. Understanding the common causes of crisis and best practices for responding can help in-house counsel guide a company through the minefield of media and public scrutiny that follows a catastrophe.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[via: <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1330267936296&amp;rss=cc" title="In-House Counsel's Guide to Crisis Management">In-House Counsel's Guide to Crisis Management</a> at CorpCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fcrisis_management%2F&amp;title=In-House%20Counsel%E2%80%99s%20Guide%20to%20Crisis%20Management" id="wpa2a_18"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/crisis_management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arnaldo Perez, Carnival Cruises&#8217; General Counsel, Faces Challenges After Italian Disaster</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/arnaldo_perez/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/arnaldo_perez/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=24346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Arnaldo Perez, Carnival's 51-year-old general counsel, leads a five-member in-house legal team coordinating the company's response to the capsized Costa Concordia.</p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Arnaldo Perez, Carnival&#8217;s 51-year-old general counsel, leads a five-member in-house legal team coordinating the company&#8217;s response to the capsized Costa Concordia.</p>
<p>[via: <a title="Carnival Cruises In-House Counsel Face Challenges After Italian Disaster" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1329962229496&amp;rss=cc">Carnival Cruises In-House Counsel Face Challenges After Italian Disaster</a> at CorpCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Farnaldo_perez%2F&amp;title=Arnaldo%20Perez%2C%20Carnival%20Cruises%E2%80%99%20General%20Counsel%2C%20Faces%20Challenges%20After%20Italian%20Disaster" id="wpa2a_20"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/arnaldo_perez/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/strangest_lawsuits-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/strangest_lawsuits-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird/Wacky/Funny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=24193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The following lawsuits exemplify the lighter, and sometimes bizarre, side of the legal world.</p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The following lawsuits exemplify the lighter, and sometimes bizarre, side of the legal world.</p>
<p>[via: <a title="8 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/xjAeHJ1qUdg/8-of-the-strangest-lawsuits-making-headlines">8 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines</a> at InsideCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fstrangest_lawsuits-3%2F&amp;title=8%20of%20the%20strangest%20lawsuits%20making%20headlines" id="wpa2a_22"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/strangest_lawsuits-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Class Actions Top 2012 Workplace Litigation Concerns</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/class_actions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/class_actions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=21984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A plan to identify and address class action vulnerabilities deserves a place at the top of any general counsel's priorities list for 2012, according to a leading workplace litigation lawyer.</p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>A plan to identify and address vulnerabilities to class actions deserves a place at the top of any general counsel&#8217;s priorities list for 2012, according to a leading workplace litigation lawyer.</p>
<p>[via: <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202538108283&amp;rss=cc" title="Class Actions Top 2012 Workplace Litigation Concerns">Class Actions Top 2012 Workplace Litigation Concerns</a> at CorpCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fclass_actions%2F&amp;title=Class%20Actions%20Top%202012%20Workplace%20Litigation%20Concerns" id="wpa2a_24"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/class_actions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New iPhone app for PACER</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/iphone_app_for_pacer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/iphone_app_for_pacer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=21038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Just in time for the holidays, the latest technological wizardry to hit Apple’s App Store is likely going to be the top gift idea for every attorney on your shopping list, and the perfect complement to their mobile computing needs. </p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Ho ho ho &#8211; an iPhone app for PACER:</p>
<blockquote><p>Just in time for the holidays, the latest technological wizardry to hit Apple’s App Store is likely going to be the top gift idea for every attorney on your shopping list, and the perfect complement to their mobile computing needs.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[via: <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/zb4kdoPbH60/new-iphone-app-for-pacer" title="New iPhone app for PACER">New iPhone app for PACER</a> at InsideCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fiphone_app_for_pacer%2F&amp;title=New%20iPhone%20app%20for%20PACER" id="wpa2a_26"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/iphone_app_for_pacer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/strangest_lawsuits-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/strangest_lawsuits-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=20708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The following lawsuits exemplify the lighter, and sometimes bizarre, side of the corporate legal world. </p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The following lawsuits exemplify the lighter, and sometimes bizarre, side of the corporate legal world. </p>
<p>[via: <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/G2fyxeVNNaM/10-of-the-strangest-lawsuits-making-headlines" title="10 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines">10 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines</a> at InsideCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fstrangest_lawsuits-2%2F&amp;title=10%20of%20the%20strangest%20lawsuits%20making%20headlines" id="wpa2a_28"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/strangest_lawsuits-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 strategies for collecting insurance dollars</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/collecting_insurance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/collecting_insurance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=20280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>2011 has been a year filled with global natural disasters, marked earlier by the Japan earthquake and more recently by the Thailand flood. These events are continuing to have financial consequences for companies around the globe with facilities, trading partners or clients in the impacted regions. </p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Your company pays the premiums &#8211; but is it collecting insurance dollars when it counts the most?</p>
<blockquote><p>2011 has been a year filled with global natural disasters, marked earlier by the Japan earthquake and more recently by the Thailand flood. These events are continuing to have financial consequences for companies around the globe with facilities, trading partners or clients in the impacted regions. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>[via: <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/oZPdeH2LGV0/litigation-5-strategies-for-collecting-maximum-ins" title="Litigation: 5 strategies for collecting maximum insurance dollars">Litigation: 5 strategies for collecting maximum insurance dollars</a> at InsideCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fcollecting_insurance%2F&amp;title=5%20strategies%20for%20collecting%20insurance%20dollars" id="wpa2a_30"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/collecting_insurance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hold everything! How to know if you need a litigation hold notice</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/litigation_hold_notice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/litigation_hold_notice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=20048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Recently, courts have served monetary sanctions ranging from $25,000 to $1 million to companies that failed to prevent the destruction of electronic evidence. </p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Want to know when you need need a litigation hold notice? Suffice it to say that the answer could be important:</p>
<blockquote><p>Recently, courts have served monetary sanctions ranging from $25,000 to $1 million to companies that failed to prevent the destruction of electronic evidence. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>[via: <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/l_OuBfxsgwk/labor-hold-everything-how-to-know-if-you-need-a-li" title="Labor: Hold everything! How to know if you need a litigation hold notice">Labor: Hold everything! How to know if you need a litigation hold notice</a> at InsideCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Flitigation_hold_notice%2F&amp;title=Hold%20everything%21%20How%20to%20know%20if%20you%20need%20a%20litigation%20hold%20notice" id="wpa2a_32"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/litigation_hold_notice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free and Reliable Downloads for the New Federal Rules of Evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/new_federal_rules_of_evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/new_federal_rules_of_evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=20130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The new Federal Rules of Evidence are here &#8211; and the Law Librarian Blog points to resources to get your copies, electronically and for free: The Restyled Federal Rules of Evidence, which became effective on December 1, 2011, are &#34;[s]impler. Easier to read. Easier to understand. These [characterizations] describe the Federal Rules of Evidence after [...]</p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The new Federal Rules of Evidence are here &#8211; and the Law Librarian Blog points to resources to get your copies, electronically and for free: </p>
<blockquote><p>The Restyled Federal Rules of Evidence, which became effective on December 1, 2011, are &quot;[s]impler. Easier to read. Easier to understand. These [characterizations] describe the Federal Rules of Evidence after their first top-to-bottom restyling since they were drafted and enacted 36 years ago,&quot; according to the Third Branch. Ah, OK but &#8230; well, for once our commercial legal publishers have a &quot;justifiable&quot; reason for shipping very expensive new pamphlet editions of FRE, a government document, this year.</p>
<p>However, here&#8217;s two free and reliable e-text alternatives from Federal Evidence Review and Cornell LII-CALI&#8230;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[via <a href='http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/law_librarian_blog/2011/12/free-and-reliable-e-texts-for-the-new-federal-rules-of-evidence-as-well-as-civil-procedure-criminal-procedure.html'>Law Librarian Blog: Free and Reliable e-Text Downloads for the New Federal Rules of Evidence (as well as 2012 editions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Criminal Procedure)</a>.]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fnew_federal_rules_of_evidence%2F&amp;title=Free%20and%20Reliable%20Downloads%20for%20the%20New%20Federal%20Rules%20of%20Evidence" id="wpa2a_36"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/new_federal_rules_of_evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Delaware Court of Chancery Unveils Largest Judgment</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/delaware_court_of_chancery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/delaware_court_of_chancery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate/Mergers and Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=19468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On Oct. 14, 2011, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a 105-page post-trial opinion in In re Southern Peru Copper Corporation Shareholder Derivative Litigation, which involved a challenge to Southern Peru Copper Corp.’s purchase of Minera Mexico, S.A. de C.V. from Southern Peru’s controlling stockholder, Grupo Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V.,... </p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>On Oct. 14, 2011, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a 105-page post-trial opinion in In re Southern Peru Copper Corporation Shareholder Derivative Litigation, which involved a challenge to Southern Peru Copper Corp.’s purchase of Minera Mexico, S.A. de C.V. from Southern Peru’s controlling stockholder, Grupo Mexico, S.A.B. de CV.  The opinion contains an award of 1.3 billion in damages &#8211; the largest in the court&#8217;s history.</p>
<p>[via: <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/i3e19xjORVQ/litigation-the-delaware-court-of-chancerys-largest" title="Litigation: The Delaware Court of Chancery’s largest judgment">Litigation: The Delaware Court of Chancery’s largest judgment</a> at InsideCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fdelaware_court_of_chancery%2F&amp;title=The%20Delaware%20Court%20of%20Chancery%20Unveils%20Largest%20Judgment" id="wpa2a_38"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/delaware_court_of_chancery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top In-House Counsel Fear Rise in Regulation Litigation</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/regulation_litigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/regulation_litigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=18774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you fear regulation litigation, you are not alone. [via: TrendWatch: Top In-House Counsel Fear Reg-Led Litigation Rise at CorpCounsel] Like this post? Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.</p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>If you fear regulation litigation, you are not alone.</p>
<p>[via: <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202532247792&amp;rss=cc" title="TrendWatch: Top In-House Counsel Fear Reg-Led Litigation Rise">TrendWatch: Top In-House Counsel Fear Reg-Led Litigation Rise</a> at CorpCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fregulation_litigation%2F&amp;title=Top%20In-House%20Counsel%20Fear%20Rise%20in%20Regulation%20Litigation" id="wpa2a_42"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/regulation_litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/strangest_lawsuits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/strangest_lawsuits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird/Wacky/Funny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=18609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The following lawsuits exemplify the lighter, and sometimes bizarre, side of the corporate legal world. </p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The following &#8220;strangest lawsuits&#8221; exemplify the lighter, and sometimes bizarre, side of the corporate legal world. </p>
<p>[via: <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/CtV4hRHRaBE/5-of-the-strangest-lawsuits-making-headlines" title="5 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines">5 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines</a> at InsideCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fstrangest_lawsuits%2F&amp;title=5%20of%20the%20strangest%20lawsuits%20making%20headlines" id="wpa2a_44"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/strangest_lawsuits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delaware Chancery Court Violated Law with ‘Secret’ Business Arbitration Program, Fed’l Suit Says</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/delaware_chancery_court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/delaware_chancery_court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=17759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A new corporate arbitration program hosted by what many consider the nation's top business court violates the U.S. Constitution by holding "secret" judicial proceedings, contends a lawsuit that was filed today in federal court in Wilmington, Del., by the Delaware Coalition for Open Government Inc. Naming all five justices of the state's chancery court as defendants, along with the state and chancery court, the suit contends the arbitration program is so similar to traditional courtroom litigation that it is unconstitutional not to have it take place on the record, according to Bloomberg and the Wilmington News Journal. "Although the statute… </p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>A new corporate arbitration program hosted by the Delaware Chancery Court violates the U.S. Constitution by holding &#8220;secret&#8221; judicial proceedings, contends a lawsuit that was filed today in federal court in Wilmington, Del., by the Delaware Coalition for Open Government Inc. </p>
<p>[via: <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/abajournal/topstories/~3/rRs7gR0mYwQ/" title="Del. Chancery Court Violated Law with ‘Secret’ Business Arbitration Program, Fed’l Suit Says">Del. Chancery Court Violated Law with ‘Secret’ Business Arbitration Program, Fed’l Suit Says</a> at the ABA Journal]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fdelaware_chancery_court%2F&amp;title=Delaware%20Chancery%20Court%20Violated%20Law%20with%20%E2%80%98Secret%E2%80%99%20Business%20Arbitration%20Program%2C%20Fed%E2%80%99l%20Suit%20Says" id="wpa2a_46"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/delaware_chancery_court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The UK Bribery Act: The Corporate Criminal Plea Sails Overseas</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/uk_bribery_act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/uk_bribery_act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=17074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> The U.K. Bribery Act arrived this summer in a hail of publicity. But that act won't move mountains without a subtle but seismic change in Britain's legal superstructure. </p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The UK Bribery Act arrived this summer in a hail of publicity. But that act won&#8217;t move mountains without a subtle but seismic change in Britain&#8217;s legal superstructure. </p>
<p>[via: <a href="http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2011/10/the-global-lawyer-the-corporate-criminal-plea-sails-overseas.html" title="The Global Lawyer: The Corporate Criminal Plea Sails Overseas">The Global Lawyer: The Corporate Criminal Plea Sails Overseas</a> at the American Lawyer]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fuk_bribery_act%2F&amp;title=The%20UK%20Bribery%20Act%3A%20The%20Corporate%20Criminal%20Plea%20Sails%20Overseas" id="wpa2a_48"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/uk_bribery_act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Litigation is down in 2011, study says</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/litigation_is_down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/litigation_is_down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=17041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Fulbright &#038; Jaworski recently released its fifth annual Litigation Trends Survey to some surprising results. </p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Fulbright &#038; Jaworski recently released its fifth annual Litigation Trends Survey to some surprising results &#8211; including that litigation is down in 2011.</p>
<p>[via: <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/Hzc4M-F7_04/litigation-down-in-2011-study-says" title="Litigation down in 2011, study says">Litigation down in 2011, study says</a> at InsideCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Flitigation_is_down%2F&amp;title=Litigation%20is%20down%20in%202011%2C%20study%20says" id="wpa2a_50"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/litigation_is_down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delaware’s distinction as U.S. bankruptcy capital in jeopardy</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/bankruptcy_capital/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/bankruptcy_capital/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=17040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Wayne Campbell’s sardonic excitement just waned even more. Delaware’s possible greatest claim to fame could be going the way of the dodo if leaders of the House Judiciary Committee have their way. </p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Delaware’s possible greatest claim to fame, as the bankruptcy capital of the US, could be going the way of the dodo if leaders of the House Judiciary Committee have their way. </p>
<p>[via: <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/iozfO-aWG48/delawares-distinction-as-us-bankruptcy-capital-in" title="Delaware’s distinction as U.S. bankruptcy capital in jeopardy">Delaware’s distinction as U.S. bankruptcy capital in jeopardy</a> at InsideCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fbankruptcy_capital%2F&amp;title=Delaware%E2%80%99s%20distinction%20as%20U.S.%20bankruptcy%20capital%20in%20jeopardy" id="wpa2a_52"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/bankruptcy_capital/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deepwater Liability and the Contractors at Risk</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/deepwater_liability/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/deepwater_liability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=16450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> Can contractors for BP be held liable for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill? That’s the latest question in the legal fallout from last year’s gargantuan spill in the Gulf. Tennille Tracy has this story on WSJ.com today saying the prospect of liability for contractors has the industry in a tizzy. U.S. regulators are set to hand out punishments in the Deepwater Horizon case as soon as this week, following a months-long investigation by the Interior Department and Coast Guard. Interior’s offshore safety chief, Michael Bromwich, has suggested in recent weeks that BP contractors Transocean Ltd. and Halliburton Co. are likely to be targeted. That has triggered a lobbying campaign by contractors and some lawmakers who say fining the contractors, typically hired by big oil companies to perform specific tasks at a drilling project, lacks precedent and may be illegal. By pursuing Transocean and Halliburton, regulators “give a green light for others to go after them—on the same basis and on the same level” as primary operators, said Brian Petty, executive vice president of government affairs at the International Association of Drilling Contractors. Mr. Bromwich says contractors should be held accountable. The process of assigning blame for the Deepwater Horizon spill is already a high-stakes game involving billions of dollars. In April, BP sued Halliburton, Transocean and Cameron International Corp., the company that made a safety device known as a blowout preventer. BP, which has set aside more than $40 billion for spill-related costs, said the other companies contributed to the disaster. Mr. Petty of the drilling contractors’ group said decades of precedent support the idea that only operators should be targeted for rule violations. Contractors say they don’t make enough money to shoulder the risks of oil spills or other major events. In other branches of the law, third-parties haven’t escaped liability. In Foreign Corrupt Practices Act cases, for example, DOJ officials have indicated companies can be held responsible for bribes paid by their agents and vendors. Tracy’s story says spokesmen for Transocean and BP declined to comment. </p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Deepwater liability? That is the question many contractors are asking themselves after last year&#8217;s Gulf oil spill.</p>
<p>[via: <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2011/10/12/contractors-in-a-tizzy-over-possible-liability/?mod=WSJBlog" title="Contractors in a Tizzy Over Possible Liability">Contractors in a Tizzy Over Possible Liability</a> at the WSJ Law Blog]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fdeepwater_liability%2F&amp;title=Deepwater%20Liability%20and%20the%20Contractors%20at%20Risk" id="wpa2a_54"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/deepwater_liability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexico Class Action Law Opens a Litigation Frontier</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/mexico_class_action_law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/mexico_class_action_law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=15383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The first class action law in Mexico's history goes into effect March 1, 2012, which has legal professionals on both sides of the border preparing for how the law will play out among potential litigants.</p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The first class action law in Mexico&#8217;s history goes into effect March 1, 2012, which has legal professionals on both sides of the border preparing for how the law will play out among potential litigants.</p>
<p>[via: <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202518442900&amp;rss=cc" title="Mexico's New Class Action Law Opens a Litigation Frontier">Mexico's New Class Action Law Opens a Litigation Frontier</a> at CorpCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fmexico_class_action_law%2F&amp;title=Mexico%20Class%20Action%20Law%20Opens%20a%20Litigation%20Frontier" id="wpa2a_56"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/mexico_class_action_law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law School Lawsuits Expanding, Lawyers Announce Plans to Sue 15 More Law Schools over Job Stats</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_school_lawsuits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_school_lawsuits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=14827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Updated: The litigation against law schools over employment statistics may be expanding. Two law firms announced today that they plan to sue 15 more law schools in seven different states, according to Law School Transparency, which posted the press release. The suits will challenge the schools’ reported employment rates for law graduates, the release says. Prior suits against Cooley Law School, New York Law School and Thomas Jefferson School of Law in California have claimed law students had been misled by job statistics that didn't specify whether jobs obtained by grads were in the legal field. In a conference call… </p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Law school lawsuits over employment statistics may be expanding. Two law firms announced today that they plan to sue 15 more law schools in seven different states.</p>
<p>[via: <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/abajournal/topstories/~3/EmmIlCpMvLc/" title="Law Firms Announce Plans to Sue 15 More Law Schools over Job Stats">Law Firms Announce Plans to Sue 15 More Law Schools over Job Stats</a> at the ABA Journal]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Flaw_school_lawsuits%2F&amp;title=Law%20School%20Lawsuits%20Expanding%2C%20Lawyers%20Announce%20Plans%20to%20Sue%2015%20More%20Law%20Schools%20over%20Job%20Stats" id="wpa2a_58"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_school_lawsuits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Setting Reserves with Confidence</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/setting-reserves/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/setting-reserves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest Contributor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=14609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>by Peter N. Farley, Guest Contributor When companies set reserves, they may seek recommendations from in-house counsel and may rely heavily on those recommendations. The challenge for many in-house counsel is getting comfortable with the estimates (determined by the accounting department) that will be the basis for the amounts recorded on the financial statements, a [...]</p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>by <a href="http://www.sutherland.com/lawyers/Detail.aspx?Attorney=2130&#038;service=46" title="Peter N. Farley of Sutherland" target="_blank">Peter N. Farley</a>, Guest Contributor</p>
<p>When companies set reserves, they may seek recommendations from in-house counsel and may rely heavily on those recommendations. The challenge for many in-house counsel is getting comfortable with the estimates (determined by the accounting department) that will be the basis for the amounts recorded on the financial statements, a process that can pose unique challenges.  To learn more about setting reserves, <a href="http://www.sutherland.com/files/Publication/031e270a-e58f-4bda-a3ec-6b75b81dfafd/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/41a0b07f-2704-47ce-9487-6d6b284b5ad5/Setting-Reserves-With-Confidence.pdf" title="Setting Reserves with Confidence" target="_blank">read this article (PDF)</a> by <a href="http://www.sutherland.com/lawyers/Detail.aspx?Attorney=2130&#038;service=46" title="Peter N. Farley of Sutherland" target="_blank">Peter N. Farley</a>, a member of <a href="http://www.sutherland.com/" title="Sutherland Law Firm" target="_blank">Sutherland’s</a> Litigation Practice Group. Previously, Peter served as General Counsel for Beaulieu Group, LLC where he managed litigation, complex federal tax and product defect matters as well as the ethics, compliance and internal audit functions. Peter continues to serve as Beaulieu&#8217;s outside general counsel as a partner with Sutherland.</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fsetting-reserves%2F&amp;title=Setting%20Reserves%20with%20Confidence" id="wpa2a_62"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/setting-reserves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Gets Down to Business</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/supreme_court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/supreme_court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=14435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> So far, we have only scratched the surface ( here and here ) of what’s in store for the Supreme Court term that begins today. The 2011-12 term promises to cover some huge issues (not even counting health-care), including police surveillance, immigration, and affirmative action. Here are the cases that the pundits are talking about: U.S. v. Jones: As this WSJ preview notes, one prominent case, U.S. v Jones, will look at the extent to which police can secretly use tracking devices without first getting a search warrant. Police say they are entitled to attach a GPS tracking device to anyone’s car for any reason and will ask the justices to reverse an appeals-court ruling that held otherwise, according to WSJ. ( Here’s a SCOTUSblog overview of the case.) Arizona v. U.S.: The case involves one of the major legal debates of recent years: the extent to which states have the power to combat illegal immigration. The Arizona law at issue allows state police to question and arrest illegal immigrants, but lower courts have blocked the law, concluding that it usurps the federal government’s authority over immigration matters. A ruling upholding the Arizona immigration law could encourage more states and cities to adopt measures that crack down on illegal residents, the Los Angeles Times notes . Fisher v. Texas: In this case involving the University of Texas and a companion case involving the University of Michigan, the high court will consider whether admissions policies that purportedly favor racial minorities are unconstitutional. According to this CNN preview, the admissions policies at issue arose in the wake of a 2003 Supreme Court ruling that allowed the University of Michigan Law School to consider race as a plus factor in making admissions decisions. But the high court, CNN reports, will weigh whether racial and gender preferences continue to be necessary to achieve a diverse student body. As if that weren’t enough excitement, there are several high-profile disputes that could make it to the Supreme Court this term, including cases involving same-sex marriage rights, WSJ reports. A federal district court in Boston struck down provisions of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which bars the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages, while San Francisco federal judge Vaughn Walker struck down the state’s Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriages. Both are awaiting appeals-court rulings, after which the parties are likely to ask the Supreme Court to weigh in, according to WSJ. </p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Get the scoop on what cases the Supreme Court will be hearing in the new term at the WSJLawBlog:</p>
<blockquote>
<p> So far, we have only scratched the surface of what’s in store for the Supreme Court term that begins today. The 2011-12 term promises to cover some huge issues (not even counting health-care), including police surveillance, immigration, and affirmative action. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>[via: <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2011/10/03/supreme-court-gets-down-to-business/?mod=WSJBlog" title="Supreme Court Gets Down to Business">Supreme Court Gets Down to Business</a> at the WSJ Law Blog]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fsupreme_court%2F&amp;title=Supreme%20Court%20Gets%20Down%20to%20Business" id="wpa2a_64"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/supreme_court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Current Trends in Securities Litigation from WestlawInsider</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/securities_litigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/securities_litigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=13779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Courtesy of WestlawInsider, understand the current trends in securities litigation by understanding this area of law and its developments over the last forty years. Read about key decisions relating to securities law litigation and gain a deeper knowledge of the primary legislative authority in this area of law. Free registration required. [via Current Trends in [...]</p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Courtesy of WestlawInsider, understand the current trends in securities litigation by understanding this area of law and its developments over the last forty years. Read about key decisions relating to securities law litigation and gain a deeper knowledge of the primary legislative authority in this area of law.  Free registration required.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://westlawinsider.com/corporate-counsel/current-trends-in-securities-litigation-how-companies-and-counsel-should-respond/" title="Current Trends in Securities Litigation" target="_blank">Current Trends in Securities Litigation at WestlawInsider</a>]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Fsecurities_litigation%2F&amp;title=Current%20Trends%20in%20Securities%20Litigation%20from%20WestlawInsider" id="wpa2a_68"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/securities_litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Litigation Hold Memos &#8211; Rules of the Road for In-House Counsel</title>
		<link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/litigation_hold_memos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/litigation_hold_memos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 06:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=11400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In-house counsel frequently encounter litigation hold memos, but many operate without set guidelines on how to handle them. Understanding the scope of a hold memo and assigning responsibility for compliance is key to protecting the business' information and its case.</p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>In-house counsel frequently encounter litigation hold memos, but many operate without set guidelines on how to handle them. Understanding the scope of a hold memo and assigning responsibility for compliance is key to protecting the business&#8217; information and its case.</p>
<p>[via: <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202514523704&amp;rss=cc" title="In-House Rules of the Road for Litigation Hold Memos">In-House Rules of the Road for Litigation Hold Memos</a> at CorpCounsel]</p>
<p>Like this post? <b><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b>  Unsubscribe at any time.<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inhouseblog.com%2Flitigation_hold_memos%2F&amp;title=Litigation%20Hold%20Memos%20%E2%80%93%20Rules%20of%20the%20Road%20for%20In-House%20Counsel" id="wpa2a_70"><img src="http://www.inhouseblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p><a href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/litigation_hold_memos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

