<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>InhouseBlog.com &#187; Law Firms</title> <atom:link href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/tag/law_firms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com</link> <description>In-House Counsel News and Jobs Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:54:48 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>Top 25 U.S. law firms named by brand</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/top_law_firms_by_brand/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/top_law_firms_by_brand/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:59:49 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=23240</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, global legal market research specialist Acritas released its first-ever U.S. Law Firm Brand Index report, which ranks the nation’s top 25 firms by the strength of their brand</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Global legal market research specialist Acritas released its first-ever U.S. Law Firm Brand Index report, which ranks the nation’s top 25 firms by the strength of their brand.</p><p>[via: <a
title="Top 25 U.S. law firms named by brand" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/72GrbFrs_9o/top-25-us-law-firms-named-by-brand">Top 25 U.S. law firms named by brand</a> at InsideCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/top_law_firms_by_brand/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>14 Outside Counsel Rules by In-House Counsel</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/outside_counsel_rules/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/outside_counsel_rules/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:07:02 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=23038</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Steve Boutwell, Director of Client Services at Kean Miller in Baton Rouge, posted &#8220;In-house Insight: Outside Counsel Rules to Live By&#8221;. A concise list that most in-house counsel will agree with &#8211; and could potentially add to! [via 14 Rules by In-House Counsel for Law Firms : Larry Bodine Law Marketing Blog.] Like this post? [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Steve Boutwell, Director of Client Services at Kean Miller in Baton Rouge, posted &#8220;In-house Insight: Outside Counsel Rules to Live By&#8221;.  A concise list that most in-house counsel will agree with &#8211; and could potentially add to!</p><p>[via <a
href='http://blog.larrybodine.com/2012/01/articles/clients/14-rules-by-inhouse-counsel-for-law-firms/'>14 Rules by In-House Counsel for Law Firms : Larry Bodine Law Marketing Blog</a>.]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/outside_counsel_rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>IBM General Counsel Robert Weber on Nonlawyer Firm Ownership</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/robert_weber/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/robert_weber/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:37:46 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[General Counsel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Practice of Law]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=21267</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>IBM's general counsel argues that lawyers have special obligations that should rule out nonlawyer investors.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>IBM&#8217;s general counsel Robert Weber argues that lawyers have special obligations that should rule out nonlawyer investors.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1324246665209&amp;rss=cc" title="IBM General Counsel Robert Weber on Nonlawyer Firm Ownership">IBM General Counsel Robert Weber on Nonlawyer Firm Ownership</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/robert_weber/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Law Firm Billing Rates Increase Only Slightly</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_firm_billing_rates-2/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_firm_billing_rates-2/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:19:59 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cost Containment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=21054</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Large law firms increased billing rates by an average of 4.4 percent in 2011, the third year of modest increases. The National Law Journal surveyed the nation’s 250 largest law firms to determine the average billing rate, a blend of associate and partner rates. The increase was 2.5 percent in 2009 and 2.7 percent in 2010. Those increases “paled in comparison to the go-go, pre-recession days when firms could charge between 6 and 8 percent more each year,” the story says.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>An holiday gift for all in-house counsel &#8211; law firm rates billing rates are not increasing like they used to:</p><blockquote><p>Large law firms increased billing rates by an average of 4.4 percent in 2011, the third year of modest increases.</p></blockquote><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/abajournal/dailynews/~3/K9mMshDqLAE/" title="Law Firm Billing Rates Increase Only Slightly for Third Straight Year">Law Firm Billing Rates Increase Only Slightly for Third Straight Year</a> at the ABA Journal]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_firm_billing_rates-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>ABA Panel Says No to Outside Law Firm Ownership</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/outside_law_firm_ownership/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/outside_law_firm_ownership/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:51:43 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[American Bar Association]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biglaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=20096</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p> While recommending that nonlawyers be allowed to take an equity stake in firms for which they work,  an American Bar Association commission suggests maintaining an existing ban on the kind of outside investment in U.S. law firms that is now possible in the United Kingdom and Australia.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Concerned in-house counsel can breathe a sigh of relief.  For now, at least, it looks like outside law firm ownership will not be on the table for US law firms.  Wall Street investors who were prepping their &#8220;Occupy Biglaw&#8221; signs will have to continue their fight in the future.</p><blockquote><p> While recommending that nonlawyers be allowed to take an equity stake in firms for which they work, an American Bar Association commission suggests maintaining an existing ban on the kind of outside investment in U.S. law firms that is now possible in the United Kingdom and Australia.</p></blockquote><p>[via: <a
href="http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2011/12/aba-commission-urges-against-outside-law-firm-ownership.html" title="ABA Panel Says No to Outside Law Firm Ownership">ABA Panel Says No to Outside Law Firm Ownership</a> at the American Lawyer]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/outside_law_firm_ownership/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>More Law Firm Mergers: Howard Rice to Wed Arnold &amp; Porter</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/more_law_firm_mergers/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/more_law_firm_mergers/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:41:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biglaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=20178</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Washington, D.C.-based Arnold &#038; Porter and midsize firm Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk &#038; Rabkin confirmed Tuesday that the two firms will be completing a merger by Jan. 1. The combined firm will have about 800 attorneys in the U.S. and Europe focusing on litigation and regulatory work.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>More mergers hit Biglaw &#8211; will law firm mergers be the hot thing in 2012?</p><blockquote><p>Washington, D.C.-based Arnold &#038; Porter and midsize firm Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk &#038; Rabkin confirmed Tuesday that the two firms will be completing a merger by Jan. 1. The combined firm will have about 800 attorneys in the U.S. and Europe focusing on litigation and regulatory work.</p></blockquote><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/law/sign_me_in.jsp?article=http://www.law.com/jsp/ca/PubArticleCA.jsp?id=1202534628199&amp;rss=newswire" title="Howard Rice Merges With Arnold &amp; Porter">Howard Rice Merges With Arnold &amp; Porter</a> at Law.com]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/more_law_firm_mergers/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Best law firms named by U.S. News &amp; World Report</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/best_law_firms/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/best_law_firms/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:21:11 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=18225</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>U.S. News &#038; World Report recently released the 2011-2012 U.S. News - Best Lawyers report, and this year, the report designates one “Law Firm of the Year” in each of the 75 practice areas it ranks nationally.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>U.S. News &#038; World Report recently released the 2011-2012 U.S. News &#8211; Best Law Firms report, and this year, the report designates one “Law Firm of the Year” in each of the 75 practice areas it ranks nationally.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/MkUs2zBizhY/best-law-firms-named-by-us-news-world-report" title="Best law firms named by U.S. News &amp; World Report">Best law firms named by U.S. News &amp; World Report</a> at InsideCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/best_law_firms/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>GC Mark J. Ohringer is &#8216;Law Firms’ Biggest Competitor&#8217;</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/mark_j_ohringer/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/mark_j_ohringer/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:22:25 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cost Containment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[General Counsel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=18100</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Fed-up with “sky-high” fees at outside firms, Jones Lang LaSalle general counsel Mark J. Ohringer says he now spends 75 percent of his budget on non-law firm resources. “I’m law firms’ biggest competitor,” Ohringer said during a program at the 2011 Futures Conference on Friday, “and I don’t think they see it that way.” Jones Lang, a global real estate and investment management firm, has boosted its in-house capabilities by 60 lawyers in the past few years, and Ohringer says he won’t hesitate to add more as the company’s needs increase. Speaking at the conference held at Chicago-Kent Law School…</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Fed-up with “sky-high” fees at outside firms, Jones Lang LaSalle general counsel Mark J. Ohringer says he now spends 75 percent of his budget on non-law firm resources. “I’m law firms’ biggest competitor,” Ohringer said during a program at the 2011 Futures Conference on Friday, “and I don’t think they see it that way.”</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/abajournal/topstories/~3/V53bpQayq1Q/" title="‘I’m Law Firms’ Biggest Competitor,’ GC Says">‘I’m Law Firms’ Biggest Competitor,’ GC Says</a> at the ABA Journal]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/mark_j_ohringer/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Data Security Is Top Concern in Annual Law Firm Technology Survey</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/data_security/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/data_security/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:16:21 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Law.com</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Data and Privacy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=18108</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Although the struggling recovery must still be reckoned with, feedback from the technology chiefs who responded to American Lawyer's annual survey on law firm technology and follow-up interviews with nearly a dozen of them reveal that the main focus has moved from dollars to data. The key issue: How do firms make information accessible to their lawyers without making it too accessible?</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Data security and availability are top on the minds of law firm technology chiefs &#8211; is your law firm keeping your data safe? Maybe it is time to ask.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/law/sign_me_in.jsp?article=http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202520992884&amp;rss=newswire" title="Security Is Top Concern in Annual Law Firm Technology Survey">Security Is Top Concern in Annual Law Firm Technology Survey</a> at Law.com]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/data_security/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Study shows rise in law firm billing rates</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_firm_billing_rates/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_firm_billing_rates/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:29:30 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cost Containment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=18058</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>As more companies make the push to cut outside spend and bring more legal work in-house, law firms are starting to feeling the crunch.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>As more companies make the push to cut outside spend and bring more legal work in-house, law firms are starting to feeling the crunch.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/UsbbaRqQgwU/study-shows-rise-in-law-firms-billing-rates" title="Study shows rise in law firms’ billing rates">Study shows rise in law firms’ billing rates</a> at InsideCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_firm_billing_rates/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Halloween Party Costumes Come Back to Haunt Foreclosure Law Firm</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/halloween_law_firm/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/halloween_law_firm/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:50:55 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Weird/Wacky/Funny]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=18049</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>A New York Times columnist is expressing outrage over Halloween costumes worn by some employees of a law firm previously in the news because of a probe into its foreclosure practices. The costumes appear to mock homeowners targeted in the law firm’s cases, showing an “appalling lack of compassion,” according to New York Times columnist Joe Nocera. The photos, taken at the Steven J. Baum law firm’s Halloween party last year, were passed along to Nocera by a former firm employee who wanted to remain anonymous. Not every department in the Baum firm used the occasion to mock homeowners, but…</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>A New York Times columnist is expressing outrage over Halloween costumes worn by some employees of a law firm previously in the news because of a probe into its foreclosure practices.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/abajournal/dailynews/~3/gE0jn41Xivs/" title="Halloween Party Costumes Come Back to Haunt Foreclosure Law Firm">Halloween Party Costumes Come Back to Haunt Foreclosure Law Firm</a> at the ABA Journal]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/halloween_law_firm/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>CLOs look for more outside counsel value</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/outside_counsel_value/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/outside_counsel_value/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:32:27 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Association of Corporate Counsel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biglaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=17724</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>The Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) recently conducted its annual Chief Legal Officer Survey, and the results aren’t too surprising.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) recently conducted its annual Chief Legal Officer Survey, and the results aren’t too surprising.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/Ib8cU4LB96E/clos-look-for-more-value-from-outside-counsel" title="CLOs look for more value from outside counsel">CLOs look for more value from outside counsel</a> at InsideCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/outside_counsel_value/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Nominate Now for 2012 Transformative Leadership Awards</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/transformative_leadership_awards/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/transformative_leadership_awards/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:29:44 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Events]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Best Corporate Counsel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Best General Counsel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Best Legal Department]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biglaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=17854</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Help shine the spotlight on law firms and law departments that have achieved demonstrable results related to increasing opportunities for the economic empowerment of women within the legal profession. If your legal department has made significant strides in elevating women to leadership positions, developed clear paths of advancement for women, or has a considerable number [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Help shine the spotlight on law firms and law departments that have achieved demonstrable results related to increasing opportunities for the economic empowerment of women within the legal profession.</p><p>If your legal department has made significant strides in elevating women to leadership positions, developed clear paths of advancement for women, or has a considerable number of women on key executive, compensation or equity partnership committees, then nominate them for a 2012 Transformative Leadership Award.</p><p>Award categories include:<br
/> •	Economic Empowerment Award (3)<br
/> •	Firm Wide Policies Award<br
/> •	Sharing the Power Award<br
/> •	Rainmaker Award<br
/> •	Pamela L. Carter Award<br
/> •	Anastasia D. Kelly Award<br
/> •	Mary Ann Hynes Pioneer Award<br
/> •	Thomas A. Mars Pathmaker Award</p><p>Nomination Deadline &#8211; November 7, 2011 &#8211; <a
href="http://www.transformativeleadershipawards.com" title="2012 Transformative Leadership Awards Nomination" target="_blank">www.transformativeleadershipawards.com</a></p><p><em>The Transformative Leadership Awards is an InhouseBlog advertiser</em>.</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/transformative_leadership_awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>A Legal Revolution Begins &#8211; at the Supermarket?</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/legal_revolution/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/legal_revolution/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 09:16:57 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Weird/Wacky/Funny]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=15059</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p> AP Can legal services be offered here? You say you wanna revolution?  Well, let’s head across the pond then and check out a new law in England and Wales that allows non-lawyers to sell legal services. Under the Legal Services Act, which takes effect today, banks, supermarkets and the like can offer legal services to consumers, according to this BBC report on the new law. These would-be competitors to law firms can create what are called Alternative Business Structures, which will offer a one-stop stop of  legal and financial advice to consumers, according to the BBC, which notes that some regulatory kinks still must be ironed out before solicitors can join the alternative structures. ( Here’s another report on the new law from The Lawyer.) Proponents say the Legal Services Act will give consumers more choice when seeking professional advice. “Potential customers will find legal services become more accessible, more efficient and more competitive,” Justice Minister Jonathan Djanogly told BBC. But some English lawyers, not surprisingly, are skeptical of the new law. “The government seem unconcerned that the introduction of Alternative Business Structures puts at risk the independence of legal advice, via the profit interests of commercial owners,” Clive Sutton, of the Solicitors Sole Practitioners Group, told BBC. One U.S. firm likely to keep close tabs of the Legal Services Act is Jacoby & Meyers; the plaintiffs’ firm, as we have noted , has filed lawsuits that seek to force New York, New Jersey and Connecticut to change their laws to allow non-lawyers to own stakes in law firms.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>A new law across the pond will allow banks, supermarkets and the like to offer legal services to consumers, according to a BBC report.  How about a will with your Marmite?  Is this the beginning of a legal revolution?</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2011/10/06/a-legal-revolution-is-underway-in-england/?mod=WSJBlog" title="A Legal Revolution Begins">A Legal Revolution Begins</a> at the WSJ Law Blog]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/legal_revolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Law Firm Mergers Rose Nearly 80 Percent in 2011&#8242;s First Three Quarters</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_firm_mergers/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_firm_mergers/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 09:40:48 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Law.com</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biglaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=14575</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Fourteen third-quarter transactions brought the total number of law firm deals so far this year to 43, a 78 percent increase over the relatively small number of mergers that the industry saw in 2010. "It looks like the law firm merger market is back," Altman Weil principal Ward Bower said, noting there is more activity in the pipeline for the fourth quarter.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Fourteen third-quarter law firm mergers brought the total number of law firm deals so far this year to 43, a 78 percent increase over the relatively small number of mergers that the industry saw in 2010.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/law/sign_me_in.jsp?article=http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202517720977&amp;rss=newswire" title="Urge to Merge: Law Firm Tie-Ups Rose Nearly 80 Percent in 2011's First Three Quarters">Urge to Merge: Law Firm Tie-Ups Rose Nearly 80 Percent in 2011's First Three Quarters</a> at Law.com]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_firm_mergers/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Biggest Law Firms in the World &#8211; 2011 Edition</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/biggest_law_firms/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/biggest_law_firms/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:30:16 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biglaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=14111</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p> Say hello to the Global 100 for 2011 . This is the American Lawyer’s list of the world’s 100 largest law firms, ranked by total revenue. There’s a lot of economic anxiety these days, with fears of a double-dip recession running rampant. But looking back — the list is compiled based on 2010 revenue numbers — the legal business seems to be hanging in there. As noted by Am Law , total revenue for the Global 100 increased by 3 percent last year.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Say hello to the Global 100 for 2011. AboveTheLaw reports on the American Lawyer’s list of the world’s 100 biggest law firms, ranked by total revenue.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/abovethelaw/~3/9eNqDAIz0-M/" title="The Biggest Law Firms in the World: Meet the Global 100">The Biggest Law Firms in the World: Meet the Global 100</a> at Above The Law]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/biggest_law_firms/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>India Considers Opening Its Doors to U.K. Law Firms</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/india_opening_doors_to_uk_law_firms/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/india_opening_doors_to_uk_law_firms/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:58:30 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=13504</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p> For law firms with global ambitions, India has long held promise as a potentially growing and lucrative market for legal services. Many firms have developed robust India practices, representing Western companies doing business in the country or Indian companies in their business dealings abroad. But one sizable roadblock stands in the way of U.S. and U.K. firms: Indian law restricts foreign firms from opening offices in the country. Indian attorneys have even sued U.S</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>For some law firms with global ambitions, India may be opening its doors.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2011/09/27/india-considers-opening-its-doors-to-u-k-law-firms/?mod=WSJBlog" title="India Considers Opening Its Doors to U.K. Law Firms">India Considers Opening Its Doors to U.K. Law Firms</a> at the WSJ Law Blog]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/india_opening_doors_to_uk_law_firms/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Who Will Decide the Future of the Law Business?</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/future_of_the_law_business/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/future_of_the_law_business/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:04:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Legal Outsourcing]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=11968</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p> Mark Harris, who runs legal services provider Axiom, is pretty sure he knows the answer.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p> Mark Harris, who runs legal services provider Axiom, is pretty sure he knows the answer.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2011/09/who-will-decide-the-future-of-the-law-business.html" title="Who Will Decide the Future of the Law Business?">Who Will Decide the Future of the Law Business?</a> at the American Lawyer]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/future_of_the_law_business/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Which Law Firms Represent America&#8217;s Biggest Companies? 2011 Report</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_firms_representing_biggest_companies/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_firms_representing_biggest_companies/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:23:04 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biglaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=11753</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Our annual look at the law firms retained by America's 100 biggest companies shows that many of the names have stayed the same, but the larger picture has changed. We also profile 4 pairs of company/counsel to see how the relationship works.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>CorpCounsel&#8217;s annual look at the law firms retained by America&#8217;s 100 biggest companies shows that many of the names have stayed the same, but the larger picture has changed. They also profile 4 pairs of company/counsel to see how the relationship works.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202514737628&amp;rss=cc" title="Who Represents America's Biggest Companies? 2011 Report">Who Represents America's Biggest Companies? 2011 Report</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_firms_representing_biggest_companies/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Interviewing To Retain Outside Counsel</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/retaining_outside_counsel/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/retaining_outside_counsel/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:42:28 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=11383</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p> Your company was just named in a new complaint, and there’s no obvious choice of counsel to defend you. What do you do? You ask around internally to see whether any of our lawyers has worked with good counsel in the jurisdiction. Perhaps you ask a trusted outside lawyer or two for recommendations. You narrow the choices down to two or three candidates, and you decide to interview the top three firms.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Looking to retain outside counsel? Hear the insights of Mark Hermann (the Vice President and Chief Counsel – Litigation at Aon) on the process at his <em>InsideStraight</em> column over at <em>AboveTheLaw</em>.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/abovethelaw/~3/3XtsJir3h_I/" title="Inside Straight: Interviewing To Retain Outside Counsel">Inside Straight: Interviewing To Retain Outside Counsel</a> at Above The Law]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/retaining_outside_counsel/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Revenue and Partner Profits Rise at Law Firms</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/revenue_and_profits_at_law_firms_rise/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/revenue_and_profits_at_law_firms_rise/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:40:16 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biglaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=11270</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p> Revenue, net income, and profits per partner rose marginally at the largest U.S. law firms during the first six months of 2011, according to a new Wells Fargo survey.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Revenue, net income, and profits per partner rose marginally at the largest U.S. law firms during the first six months of 2011, according to a new Wells Fargo survey.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2011/09/law-firm-revenue-and-partner-profits-rise-for-first-time-since-2008.html" title="Report: First Half of Year Saw Law Firm Revenue, Partner Profits Rise">Report: First Half of Year Saw Law Firm Revenue, Partner Profits Rise</a> at the American Lawyer]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/revenue_and_profits_at_law_firms_rise/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Ranking Law Firms &#8211; by Summer Associates!</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/top_law_firms_by_summer_associates/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/top_law_firms_by_summer_associates/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:30:10 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=11404</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p> Like many a competitive soul, we at the Law Blog love rankings. Thereâ€™s hardly a top-10 list we donâ€™t like. (Click here , here and here for other recent posts extolling law-related rankings.) So, we are more than a bit jazzed to learn about a new ranking of the Top 10 Law Firm Summer Associate Programs, courtesy of the folks at Vault.com. Between February and April, Vault surveyed about 16,000 law firm associates from 166 law firms across the country, asking them such questions as which firms offered the best work experience, which provided the most realistic view of what it would be like to work at the firm, and which programs were the most fun. The winners? 1.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Law firms are used to being ranked by various organizations &#8211; but how about by their own summer associates? A new ranking of the Top 10 Law Firm Summer Associate Programs has been published, courtesy of the folks at Vault.com. Vault surveyed about 16,000 law firm associates from 166 law firms across the country to get their take on their summer experience.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2011/09/15/welcoming-the-newest-top-10-law-firm-ranking/?mod=WSJBlog" title="Welcoming the Newest Top-10 Law Firm Ranking">Welcoming the Newest Top-10 Law Firm Ranking</a> at the WSJ Law Blog]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/top_law_firms_by_summer_associates/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Company CEOs are key decision-makers in selecting outside counsel, not in-house counsel</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/outside_counsel_selection/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/outside_counsel_selection/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:42:19 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=10955</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p> “Much of my time and our marketing and sales effort over the past decade have been wasted through concentrating on the wrong people.” That was the stunned reaction of one law firm leader on learning that the client chief executive officer (CEO) or chair is primarily responsible for a massive 82% of law firm appointments for organisations with sales up to $500m (£303m), according to a recent Managing Partners’ Forum (MPF) survey. This compares with just 6% of organisations where such appointments are the responsibility of general counsel.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Step aside in-house counsel, the outside counsel selection decisions are apparently being made higher up:</p><p> “Much of my time and our marketing and sales effort over the past decade have been wasted through concentrating on the wrong people.” That was the stunned reaction of one law firm leader on learning that the client chief executive officer (CEO) or chair is primarily responsible for a massive 82% of law firm appointments for organisations with sales up to $500m (£303m), according to a recent Managing Partners’ Forum (MPF) survey. This compares with just 6% of organisations where such appointments are the responsibility of general counsel.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.legalweek.com/legal-week/analysis/2107209/company-ceos-key-decision-makers-appointing-law-firms-house-counsel?WT.rss_f=&amp;WT.rss_a=Company+CEOs+are+key+decision-makers+in+selecting+law+firms%2C+not+in-house+counsel" title="Company CEOs are key decision-makers in selecting law firms, not in-house counsel">Company CEOs are key decision-makers in selecting law firms, not in-house counsel</a> at LegalWeek]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/outside_counsel_selection/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Legal Outsourcing and &#8220;The Rise of the Non-Firm Firms&#8221;</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/legal_outsourcing_and_non-firmfirms/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/legal_outsourcing_and_non-firmfirms/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:27:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Legal Outsourcing]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=9070</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>I want to talk about an important trend in legal services, the emergence of the “Non-Firm Firm.” What is a "non-firm firm," and why does it have advantages over the traditional firm? Let’s look at five characteristics of the non-firm firm (let’s call them NFFs) and contrast them with the traditional firms (TFs). 1) Process-focused. How many times have you heard a TF explain the two or three areas its lawyers are uniquely good at, but then go on to say “but of course, we’re really good at everything else, too.” The NFF doesn’t do that. They do a few…</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Will the growth of non-firm firms (NFFs) lead more traditional firms (TFs) to say &#8220;WTF?&#8221;. More importantly, what will the increasing proliferation of NFFs mean for law department management in the coming years? Certainly a trend that requires close monitoring &#8211; terms such as &#8220;legal outsourcing&#8221; and &#8220;legal process outsourcing&#8221; are rapidly evolving.</p><blockquote><p>I want to talk about an important trend in legal services, the emergence of the “Non-Firm Firm.” What is a &#8220;non-firm firm,&#8221; and why does it have advantages over the traditional firm? Let’s look at five characteristics of the non-firm firm (let’s call them NFFs) and contrast them with the traditional firms (TFs).</p></blockquote><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/abajournal/dailynews/~3/A52gH-Zdug8/" title="The Rise of the Non-Firm Firms">The Rise of the Non-Firm Firms</a> at the ABA Journal]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/legal_outsourcing_and_non-firmfirms/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Ground-breaking law firm diversity initiative includes 23 major firms</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law-firm-diversity-initiative/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law-firm-diversity-initiative/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:06:35 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Diversity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=9286</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p> Twenty-three UK and Irish law firms have come together for a groundbreaking initiative to boost social mobility in the profession with a wide-ranging work experience scheme. The project, dubbed PRIME, will see the firms involved commit to provide significant work experience programmes for state school children from non-privileged backgrounds in a profession-wide bid to improve social diversity in law.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Cheers to the participating law firms across the pond as they embark on this law firm diversity initiative:</p><blockquote><p>Twenty-three UK and Irish law firms have come together for a groundbreaking initiative to boost social mobility in the profession with a wide-ranging work experience scheme. The project, dubbed PRIME, will see the firms involved commit to provide significant work experience programmes for state school children from non-privileged backgrounds in a profession-wide bid to improve social diversity in law.</p></blockquote><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.legalweek.com/legal-week/news/2108264/23-major-law-firms-ground-breaking-diversity-initiative?WT.rss_f=&amp;WT.rss_a=23+major+law+firms+come+together+for+ground-breaking+diversity+initiative" title="23 major law firms come together for ground-breaking diversity initiative">23 major law firms come together for ground-breaking diversity initiative</a> at LegalWeek]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law-firm-diversity-initiative/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Law Firm Salaries for Associates ‘in Stasis’ says NALP; How about Law Firm Rates?</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_firm_salaries/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_firm_salaries/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:59:30 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biglaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=9850</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>The median salary for first-year associates working at law firms is $115,000, the same figure as last year, according to a law firm survey by the National Association for Law Placement. NALP executive director James Leipold says in a press release that law firm salaries are showing little movement. “Following the recession, law firm associate salaries are in stasis,” he said. NALP receives more salary reports from large than small firms. The median ranged from a low of $73,000 in firms of two-to-25 lawyers to $160,000 in firms of more than 700 lawyers</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>If law firm associate salaries are in stasis, should law firm rates be in stasis as well?</p><blockquote><p>The median salary for first-year associates working at law firms is $115,000, the same figure as last year, according to a law firm survey by the National Association for Law Placement. NALP executive director James Leipold says in a press release that law firm salaries are showing little movement. “Following the recession, law firm associate salaries are in stasis,” he said. NALP receives more salary reports from large than small firms. The median ranged from a low of $73,000 in firms of two-to-25 lawyers to $160,000 in firms of more than 700 lawyers&#8230;</p></blockquote><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/abajournal/topstories/~3/3oCzJYrtfDQ/" title="Law Firm Associate Salaries ‘in Stasis’; First-Year Median Is Still $115K, NALP Says">Law Firm Associate Salaries ‘in Stasis’; First-Year Median Is Still $115K, NALP Says</a> at the ABA Journal]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_firm_salaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Merger Fever is Spreading in Legal Biz</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/merger-fever-spreading-legal-biz/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/merger-fever-spreading-legal-biz/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:33:03 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biglaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=8367</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p> Firms are hooking up, or at least flirting with each other, at a level not seen in a while, according to this article today in WSJ. Itâ€™s a sign that some firms are bullish about the legal market and are willing to invest the time and money into merger discussions, which so often founder over cultural differences, compensation disputes, or client conflicts. â€œComing out of the recession, quite a few firms have shifted from survival mode and are dusting off their strategic plans to grow,â€� said Ward Bower, a principal at Altman Weil Inc. â€œThere is more interest now [among firms] in merging than at any time in the past 10 to 20 years,â€� said Kent Zimmermann , a consultant with Zeughauser Group.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p> Firms are hooking up, or at least flirting with each other, at a level not seen in a while, according to&#8230;&#8221;There is more interest now [among firms] in merging than at any time in the past 10 to 20 years&#8221;, said Kent Zimmermann, a consultant with Zeughauser Group.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2011/09/01/merger-fever-is-spreading-in-legal-biz/?mod=WSJBlog" title="Merger Fever is Spreading in Legal Biz">Merger Fever is Spreading in Legal Biz</a> at the WSJ Law Blog]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/merger-fever-spreading-legal-biz/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>African stampede &#8211; why the scramble for Africa can benefit both international and local firms</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/african-stampede--scramble-africa-benefit-international-local-firms/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/african-stampede--scramble-africa-benefit-international-local-firms/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:45:37 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biglaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=8716</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p> The stampede to enter the African legal market can benefit both international and local law firms, says Shearman &#038; Sterling’s Christophe Asselineau</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p> The stampede to enter the African legal market can benefit both international and local law firms, says Shearman &#038; Sterling’s Christophe Asselineau.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.legalweek.com/legal-week/analysis/2105346/african-stampede-scramble-africa-benefit-international-local-firms?WT.rss_f=&amp;WT.rss_a=African+stampede+-+why+the+scramble+for+Africa+can+benefit+both+international+and+local+firms" title="African stampede - why the scramble for Africa can benefit both international and local firms">African stampede - why the scramble for Africa can benefit both international and local firms</a> at LegalWeek]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/african-stampede--scramble-africa-benefit-international-local-firms/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>DLA Piper Program Will Assign Two New Associates to Pro Bono Work Only</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/dla-piper-program-assign-associates-pro-bono-work/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/dla-piper-program-assign-associates-pro-bono-work/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:58:49 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pro Bono]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=8042</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>DLA Piper will select two new associates each year to work exclusively on pro bono matters in a new fellowship program announced on Monday. The associates will receive the usual pay—ranging from $145,000 to $160,000, depending on the region—to do pro bono work for their first year at the law firm, the Am Law Daily reports. The program is a tribute to recently retired partner Sheldon Krantz, who served as director of the firm’s global pro bono affiliate called New Perimeter, according to a press release. New Perimeter addresses issues such as law reform, human rights and legal education in…</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>DLA Piper will select two new associates each year to work exclusively on pro bono matters in a new fellowship program announced on Monday. The associates will receive the usual pay—ranging from $145,000 to $160,000, depending on the region—to do pro bono work for their first year at the law firm, the Am Law Daily reports.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/abajournal/topstories/~3/ld4WD2iMovw/" title="DLA Piper Program Will Assign Two New Associates to Pro Bono Work Only">DLA Piper Program Will Assign Two New Associates to Pro Bono Work Only</a> at the ABA Journal]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/dla-piper-program-assign-associates-pro-bono-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>BigLaw and Full Service: Damn the Torpedoes</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/biglaw-full-service-damn-torpedoes/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/biglaw-full-service-damn-torpedoes/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:42:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biglaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Opinion and Commentary]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=7403</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>The WiredGC continues its commentary on BigLaw and the changing legal services landscape. [via BigLaw and Full Service: Damn the Torpedoes &#124; Wired GC.] Like this post? Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The <em>WiredGC</em> continues its commentary on BigLaw and the changing legal services landscape.</p><p>[via <a
href='http://www.wiredgc.com/2011/08/25/biglaw-and-full-service-damn-the-torpedoes/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wiredgc+%28The+Wired+GC%29'>BigLaw and Full Service: Damn the Torpedoes | Wired GC</a>.]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/biglaw-full-service-damn-torpedoes/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
