<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>InhouseBlog.com &#187; Law Department Management</title> <atom:link href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/tag/law_department_management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com</link> <description>In-House Counsel News and Jobs Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:03:24 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>Difficult boss? Challenges for in-house counsel</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/difficult_boss/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/difficult_boss/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:54:48 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=23628</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>It's no secret that bosses can be difficult people. So why would in-house counsel think they are immune from having one? On the flip side, if you supervise others, have you ever been surprised to learn that your direct reports consider you to be difficult (and you don’t)?Being “difficult” can be in the eye of the beholder, with many shades and meanings. It can be good for direct reports and the organization, when change requires a forceful approach. When a supervising attorney is a "bad boss," it can have disastrous consequences.If you're a difficult boss, consider these strategies and reminders:Control your difficult side.Make sure you're in control of your difficult side. It’s one thing to be tough and demanding, to get the best out of your team. But if you have a difficult nature that results from bad habits, you have work to do on improving your own competencies.Be comfortable with your responsibilities.At times, being a tough boss comes with the territory. As leadership authors Hill and Lineback write, it takes “courage to make hard decisions or take tough actions, such as giving difficult feedback, denying a promotion to someone who's good but not good enough, . . . or even laying off people when the economy goes bad.”The First Requirement for Becoming a Great Boss.Candor helps.So while there is no need to apologize (although it might help), be as candid as you can with your team or impacted direct reports. They should appreciate your explanation and openness about the company’s problems, the demands of your job, or a personal issue. Then watch themrise to the occasion.Be clear.If your toughness is directed at changing the competencies of a direct report, make sure you have been clear as to what you're trying to accomplish. Change management is an art-form for which there are few short cuts. If you're at the point that you need to be difficult, your direct report should understand how serious this is. If you’re being passively aggressive because you don’t have the patience for change management, you’re unlikely to succeed.Be "perfectly assertive."With a little fine-tuning, you may be able to turn your difficult nature into the desired competency of assertiveness.As Bob Sutton writes:"Being just assertive enough, while not easy for any boss, is one of the most important features of a good one. . . . the best bosses get the balance right on any given day, and in myriad interactions with their followers, peers, and own bosses."The Delicate Art of Being Perfectly Assertive.It may be you.And then there’s the possibility that your difficult behavior is known to everyone but you. Paraphrasing Bob Sutton, you may have "aflawed and incomplete understanding of what it feels like to work for [you]."12 Things Good Bosses Believe.Seek (and be open to) feedback. Hopefully, your organization or direct reports will have the courage to give you feedback, and you'll be open to it. If you've just received this feedback in a 360 evaluation, take a deep breath and handle it well.Bouncing Back from a Negative 360-Degree Review.If you're not getting that feedback, you may "need courage just to seek" it "and even more to digest and take action based on it."The First Requirement for Becoming a Great Boss. Another good read on this topic isSeeing Yourself as Others See You.You may have some homework to do, but taming your difficult self will go a long way toward your being the best atLeadingInHouse.smThis summary was prepared by Perry Cone and posted at LeadingInHouse.com.Legal Notice and Disclaimer</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Are you a difficult boss? Or do you have one? Read on at LeadingInhouse:</p><blockquote><p>It&#8217;s no secret that bosses can be difficult people. So why would in-house counsel think they are immune from having one? On the flip side, if you supervise others, have you ever been surprised to learn that your direct reports consider you to be difficult (and you don’t)? Being “difficult” can be in the eye of the beholder, with many shades and meanings. It can be good for direct reports and the organization, when change requires a forceful approach. When a supervising attorney is a &#8220;bad boss,&#8221; it can have disastrous consequences.</p></blockquote><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.leadinginhouse.com/2012/02/difficult-boss-challenges-for-in-house.html" title="Difficult boss? Challenges for in-house counsel">Difficult boss? Challenges for in-house counsel</a> at LeadingInhouse]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/difficult_boss/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>14 Outside Counsel Rules by In-House Counsel</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/outside_counsel_rules/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/outside_counsel_rules/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:07:02 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=23038</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Steve Boutwell, Director of Client Services at Kean Miller in Baton Rouge, posted &#8220;In-house Insight: Outside Counsel Rules to Live By&#8221;. A concise list that most in-house counsel will agree with &#8211; and could potentially add to! [via 14 Rules by In-House Counsel for Law Firms : Larry Bodine Law Marketing Blog.] Like this post? [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Steve Boutwell, Director of Client Services at Kean Miller in Baton Rouge, posted &#8220;In-house Insight: Outside Counsel Rules to Live By&#8221;.  A concise list that most in-house counsel will agree with &#8211; and could potentially add to!</p><p>[via <a
href='http://blog.larrybodine.com/2012/01/articles/clients/14-rules-by-inhouse-counsel-for-law-firms/'>14 Rules by In-House Counsel for Law Firms : Larry Bodine Law Marketing Blog</a>.]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/outside_counsel_rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Futurist tells in-house counsel to rethink legal service delivery</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/legal_service_delivery/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/legal_service_delivery/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:55:05 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bar Associations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=23035</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Looking for ideas on re-inventing legal service delivery? Check out this recent article at Canadian Lawyer Magazine: If you were given a blank sheet of paper and asked to design your in-house legal department from scratch, what would it look like? That’s a question posed by futurist and author Richard Susskind, to a group of [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Looking for ideas on re-inventing legal service delivery? Check out this recent article at Canadian Lawyer Magazine:</p><blockquote><p>If you were given a blank sheet of paper and asked to design your in-house legal department from scratch, what would it look like? That’s a question posed by futurist and author Richard Susskind, to a group of about 50 in-house counsel during a Canadian Corporate Counsel Association Master Class yesterday in Toronto.</p></blockquote><p>[via <a
href='http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/legalfeeds/666/Futurist-tells-in-house-to-rethink-service-delivery.html'>Futurist tells in-house to rethink service delivery | Canadian Lawyer Legal Feeds</a>]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/legal_service_delivery/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Clear Data on Rising Law Firm Rates as Firms Get Larger</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_firm_rates/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_firm_rates/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:06:40 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biglaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cost Containment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=22494</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Want to know where law firm rates are going as law firms get larger? Rees Morrison has some data over at the Law Department Management Blog. [via: Clear data on the rising rates of law firms as they grow larger at the Law Department Management Blog] Like this post? Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Want to know where law firm rates are going as law firms get larger? Rees Morrison has some data over at the Law Department Management Blog.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/TfzN/~3/GtpDQNCNyVI/clear-data-on-the-rising-rates-of-law-firms-as-they-grow-larger.html" title="Clear data on the rising rates of law firms as they grow larger">Clear data on the rising rates of law firms as they grow larger</a> at the Law Department Management Blog]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_firm_rates/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>A record 829 law departments in the Fifth Release of GC Metrics’ Law Department Benchmarking Survey (Get Yours!)</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_department_benchmarking-2/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_department_benchmarking-2/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:44:31 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=22196</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>The Fifth Release of the GC Metrics global benchmark survey will go this week to 829 participating law departments. That is a record increase of 24 from last year. There are now 27 industries detailed, with the addition of special...</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Big Data for law departments &#8211; in this latest release of GC Metrics&#8217; law department benchmarking survey:</p><blockquote><p>The Fifth Release of the GC Metrics global benchmark survey will go out this week to 829 participating law departments. That is a record increase of 24 from last year. There are now 27 industries detailed.</p></blockquote><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/TfzN/~3/jlIkn7ifwX4/a-record-829-law-departments-in-the-fifth-release-of-gc-metrics-benchmark-survey-and-you-can-get-it-.html" title="A record 829 law departments in the Fifth Release of GC Metrics’ benchmark survey – and you can get it">A record 829 law departments in the Fifth Release of GC Metrics’ benchmark survey – and you can get it</a> at the Law Department Management Blog]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_department_benchmarking-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Apple Handles Anobit Acquisition In-House</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/apple/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/apple/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:30:20 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Corporate/M&A]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=22000</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p> Three months after the death of cofounder Steve Jobs, Apple has confirmed the purchase of Israeli flash memory storage company Anobit Technologies, one of the largest acquisitions in the Cupertino, California–based company's history.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Who needs Biglaw when you can handle a M&#038;A deal in-house?</p><blockquote><p> Three months after the death of cofounder Steve Jobs, Apple has confirmed the purchase of Israeli flash memory storage company Anobit Technologies, one of the largest acquisitions in the Cupertino, California–based company&#8217;s history.</p></blockquote><p>[via: <a
href="http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2012/01/apple-anobit.html" title="Apple Handles Hardware Maker Acquisition In-House">Apple Handles Hardware Maker Acquisition In-House</a> at the American Lawyer]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>An in-your-face-firm view of what law departments ought not to be charged for</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/cost_containment/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/cost_containment/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:33:54 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cost Containment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=21404</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>“Whatever does not add tangible value to client projects is overhead that clients should not be directly or indirectly paying for.” That was the aggressive tagline on a slide by Lee Cheng, the general counsel of Newegg. I did not...</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Is your law department paying for things it should not be? Cost containment will be a key driver in 2012:</p><blockquote><p>“Whatever does not add tangible value to client projects is overhead that clients should not be directly or indirectly paying for.” That was the aggressive tagline on a slide by Lee Cheng, the general counsel of Newegg.</p></blockquote><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/TfzN/~3/b6Z_djJLBP4/an-in-your-face-firm-view-of-what-law-departments-ought-not-to-be-charged-for.html" title="An in-your-face-firm view of what law departments ought not to be charged for">An in-your-face-firm view of what law departments ought not to be charged for</a> at the Law Department Management Blog]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/cost_containment/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>MIPS Technologies&#8217; General Counsel Does Big Work with a Small In-house Team</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/mips_general_counsel/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/mips_general_counsel/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:21:26 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Diversity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[General Counsel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=21268</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>A brief taste of in-house work in 1995 led to Gail Shulman's 12-year career at MIPS Technologies, culminating in her promotion to general counsel in 2009.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>A brief taste of in-house work in 1995 led to Gail Shulman&#8217;s 12-year career at MIPS Technologies, culminating in her promotion to general counsel in 2009.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1324246823059&amp;rss=cc" title="MIPS Technologies' GC Does Big Work with a Small In-house Team">MIPS Technologies' GC Does Big Work with a Small In-house Team</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/mips_general_counsel/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>General Counsel Issues for 2012</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/general_counsel_issues_for_2012/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/general_counsel_issues_for_2012/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 12:25:44 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=21266</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>We surveyed 107 general counsel and some of their deputies at U.S. companies about the new year of in-house law. Their responses suggest that they and their companies will face a challenging year ahead.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>CorpCounsel surveyed 107 general counsel and some of their deputies at U.S. companies about general counsel issues for 2012. Their responses suggest that there were many challenging issues.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1324247055495&amp;rss=cc" title="General Counsel on Their Issues for 2012">General Counsel on Their Issues for 2012</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/general_counsel_issues_for_2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Still Time to Join 800 Law Departments For the Final Release of General Counsel Metrics LLC&#8217;s Survey</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/general_counsel_metrics/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/general_counsel_metrics/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:07:02 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sites]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=20767</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Release 4 of their survey goes out this week, bulging with key benchmark metrics from 740 law departments. That marks quite a jump from 530 legal departments in October’s Release 3. Many more will take part in this epic benchmarking effort before it closes in January. There is no cost and only six pieces of [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Release 4 of their survey goes out this week, bulging with key benchmark metrics from 740 law departments.  That marks quite a jump from 530 legal departments in October’s Release 3.  Many more will take part in this epic benchmarking effort before it closes in January.  There is no cost and only six pieces of data need to be entered on the secure online survey: your staffing numbers, internal and external legal spend, and revenue.</p><p>Companies that take part will also be eligible for two exciting products to be announced early next year.  GC Metrics will send them Insights, an innovative report on matter management systems, as well as findings from the combination of two years of data – more than 1,200 law departments!</p><p><a
href="https://novisurvey.net/n/4ka.aspx" title="General Counsel Metrics LLC's Law Department Survey" target="_blank">Click here</a> to take General Counsel Metric’s seven-minute survey and receive your report of 65 pages in mid-January.  It will cover at least 24 industries.</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/general_counsel_metrics/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Law Department Spending is Up</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_department_spending-2/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_department_spending-2/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:19:48 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Law.com</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=20407</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Survey indicates a majority of chief legal officers increased internal and external budgets in the past year.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Law department spending survey indicates a majority of chief legal officers increased internal and external budgets in the past year.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202535093589&amp;rss=nlj" title="IN-HOUSE COUNSEL: In law departments, spending ticks up">IN-HOUSE COUNSEL: In law departments, spending ticks up</a> at the National Law Journal]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_department_spending-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Canadian Lawyer Magazine Survey points to more work for Law Departments</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/more-work-for-law-departments/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/more-work-for-law-departments/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:17:30 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Inhouse Life]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=19256</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>The results of the Canadian Lawyer magazine&#8217;s recent survey are out &#8211; and it looks like the trend towards more work for law departments is continuing: Once again in this issue, we share the results of the annual Canadian Lawyer corporate counsel survey, which gauges the relationship between in-house counsel and their outside legal service [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The results of the Canadian Lawyer magazine&#8217;s recent survey are out &#8211; and it looks like the trend towards more work for law departments is continuing:</p><blockquote><p>Once again in this issue, we share the results of the annual Canadian Lawyer corporate counsel survey, which gauges the relationship between in-house counsel and their outside legal service providers. It’s not surprising that one of our main findings is that the economy, and its current state of instability, is having an effect on corporate law departments.</p></blockquote><p>[via <a
href='http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/3938/more-work-for-in-house-departments.html'>More work for in-house departments | Canadian Lawyer Magazine</a>]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/more-work-for-law-departments/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The role of the General Counsel in creating a successful PR strategy</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/general-counsel-pr-strategy/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/general-counsel-pr-strategy/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[General Counsel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=19255</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>If you are a general counsel, you know that crisis management is key to your role in your company. The question is &#8211; are you prepared to handle a crisis when it hits? It’s 9 o’clock on Monday morning and you’re greeted by a swarm of reporters standing outside your office door, demanding answers. Inside, [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>If you are a general counsel, you know that crisis management is key to your role in your company.  The question is &#8211; are you prepared to handle a crisis when it hits?</p><blockquote><p>It’s 9 o’clock on Monday morning and you’re greeted by a swarm of reporters standing outside your office door, demanding answers. Inside, a crisis is brewing that no one is equipped to handle; within hours, it spins out of control.</p></blockquote><p>[via <a
href='http://www.corporatesecretary.com/articles/corporate-secretary-week/12059/general-counsels-role-creating-successful-pr-strategy/'>The general counsel's role in creating a successful PR strategy</a>]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/general-counsel-pr-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Startup Analyzes Corporate Law Department Spending</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_department_spending/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_department_spending/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:39:23 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cost Containment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=19005</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Technology startup Sky Analytics opened its spending benchmarking service for corporate legal departments this week, with a focus on simplicity.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Technology startup Sky Analytics opened its law department spending benchmarking service for corporate legal departments this week, with a focus on simplicity.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1321211517841&amp;rss=cc" title="Startup Analyzes Corporate Legal Department Spending">Startup Analyzes Corporate Legal Department Spending</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_department_spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Get General Counsel Metrics, LLC&#8217;s Law Department Benchmarking Release 4.0 based on 900+ participants at No Cost in December</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_department_benchmarking/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_department_benchmarking/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:37:14 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Events]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=18531</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Learn your five key law department benchmarking metrics: get General Counsel Metrics’ Release 4.0 based on 900+ participants at no cost in December. There is no charge for anything and you will receive the 70-page PDF report by e-mail in mid-December. Paste the survey link https://novisurvey.net/n/4ka.aspx into your browser and answer as many as you [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Learn your five key law department benchmarking metrics: get General Counsel Metrics’ Release 4.0 based on 900+ participants at no cost in December.  There is no charge for anything and you will receive the 70-page PDF report by e-mail in mid-December.</p><p>Paste the survey link <a
href="https://novisurvey.net/n/4ka.aspx" title="Law Department Management Survey" target="_blank">https://novisurvey.net/n/4ka.aspx</a> into your browser and answer as many as you can of the six law department benchmarking questions:</p><p>- the number of your lawyers, paralegals, and other staff broken out as of Dec. 31, 2010;</p><p>- your internal and external legal spend during fiscal 2010; and</p><p>- your company’s revenue during fiscal 2010.</p><p>Compare your law department’s metrics within your industry. Here are the participant numbers from Release 3.0 in each industry:</p><p>Aerospace 15; Business Services 23; Construction/Engineering 14; Consumer Products 22; Education 8; Energy 25; Extractive/Mining/Chemicals 21; Fin. Services 43; Food &#038; Beverage 27; Healthcare 17; Insurance 21; Leisure/Entertainment/Media 13; Manufacturing 83; Medical Devices 22; Not for Profit/Gov’t; 13; Pharma 10; Retail 26; Technology 43; Telecomm 23; Transportation 22; and Utilities 16.</p><p>About one-quarter each of the law departments are in companies with revenue up to $214 million; from $218 million to $1.25 billion; $1.26 to $4.6 billion; and greater than $4.6 billion.</p><p>Please write Rees Morrison if you have any questions at rees [at] reesmorrison.com.</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_department_benchmarking/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Chubb&#8217;s Inhouse Counsel Insurance Helps Protect In-House Attorneys</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/inhouse_counsel_insurance/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/inhouse_counsel_insurance/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:46:37 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=18445</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>A new policy from the Chubb Group of Insurance Companies helps protect the personal assets of in-house attorneys. Inhouse counsel insurance is something law departments should look into and discuss with their corporate risk managers &#8211; especially as in-house counsel are increasingly becoming targets in litigation and governmental investigations: Employed Lawyers Professional Liability by ChubbSM [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>A new policy from the Chubb Group of Insurance Companies helps protect the personal assets of in-house attorneys.  Inhouse counsel insurance is something law departments should look into and discuss with their corporate risk managers &#8211; especially as in-house counsel are increasingly becoming targets in litigation and governmental investigations:</p><blockquote><p>Employed Lawyers Professional Liability by ChubbSM offers in-house attorneys and their employers broad protection against allegations of legal malpractice stemming from the services provided by in-house counsel for activities such as the review of shareholder communications and the issuance of legal opinions to the board of directors. Coverage is provided for judgments, settlements and defense costs. It also extends to civil penalties leveled against in-house counsel under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.</p></blockquote><p>[via <a
href='http://www.chubb.com/corporate/chubb14481.html'>Chubb Helps Protect In-House Attorneys from Allegations of Malpractice</a>.]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/inhouse_counsel_insurance/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Alternative Fee Arrangements Can Reveal Untapped Opportunities</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/alternative_fee_arrangements/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/alternative_fee_arrangements/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:20:37 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Alternative Fee Arrangements]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=18419</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Reed Smith's Tom Baldwin and Andrew Baker note that meeting the challenges of alternative fee arrangements and client requests requires a quintessential "team effort."</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Reed Smith&#8217;s Tom Baldwin and Andrew Baker note that meeting the challenges of alternative fee arrangements and client requests requires a quintessential &#8220;team effort.&#8221;</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1320060103464&amp;rss=cc" title="Rethinking Fee Arrangements Can Reveal Untapped Opportunities">Rethinking Fee Arrangements Can Reveal Untapped Opportunities</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/alternative_fee_arrangements/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Legal Secretaries Prefer Working With Men, Survey Finds</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/legal_secretaries/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/legal_secretaries/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:32:23 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=17624</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p> Politics and religion aren’t the only minefields of polite conversation. You’d probably also be wise to  steer clear of talking about gender roles in the workplace, if you’re trying to keep things light. But let’s go there anyway. As LB has written in the past , a study by Felice Batlan , a Chicago-Kent law professor, found that legal secretaries “prefer not to work for women associates or partners.” Now, according to an article in the ABA Journal, the survey has been published and the final percentages in the study are pretty stark: Not one legal secretary surveyed preferred working with a female partner, and only 3% said they preferred working with a female associate. To be fair, 47% of the 142 legal secretaries surveyed — 95% of whom were women — expressed no opinion on the matter. Thirty-five percent said they preferred working for male partners, and 15% preferred male associates. Most of those surveyed were middle-aged and had considerable experience, ABA Journal said. The survey is the subject of an article in Studies in Law, Politics, and Society by Felice Batlan , who recently spoke at the South Carolina Women Lawyers Association conference. Some of the secretaries indicated they didn’t like working for woman because they were too independent, while others commented that female attorneys were harder on their assistants, ABA Journal noted. “Too emotional” came up in more than one comment from respondents. Batlan writes that the legal secretaries’ attitudes about women attorneys could be influenced by societal expectations. “For a woman to serve a man is an arrangement that conforms to and reproduces dominant and traditional, although contested and changing, gender arrangements,” she writes. “Gender structures tell men that they are entitled to women’s help and that women are supposed to freely give it.” She also suggests that legal secretaries want to work for those in power in law firms, which are typically still men. “You’d have to be deaf, dumb and blind not to notice the strict hierarchy in all law firms,” Victoria Pynchon writes in Forbes, commenting on Batlan’s recent presentation. Batlan’s survey also found that 71% of respondents said the recession affected their jobs, and 81% said their firm had laid off secretaries. Most worked a 30-40 hour week, and 67% said they felt respected by the attorneys.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>A post that may stir up some comments:</p><blockquote><p> &#8220;&#8216;&#8230;a study by Felice Batlan, a Chicago-Kent law professor, found that legal secretaries “prefer not to work for women associates or partners.&#8217; Now, according to an article in the ABA Journal, the survey has been published and the final percentages in the study are pretty stark: Not one legal secretary surveyed preferred working with a female partner, and only 3% said they preferred working with a female associate.&#8221;</p></blockquote><p>[via: <a
href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2011/10/24/legal-secretaries-really-prefer-working-with-male-attorneys-survey-finds/?mod=WSJBlog" title="Legal Secretaries Prefer Working With Men, Survey Finds">Legal Secretaries Prefer Working With Men, Survey Finds</a> at the WSJ Law Blog]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/legal_secretaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>IBM legal department hires straight from law school and locates half its lawyers outside the U.S.</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/ibm_legal_department/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/ibm_legal_department/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:45:30 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Inhouse Counsel Jobs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Schools]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=17182</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Remarks on a recent panel by Robert Weber, the General Counsel of IBM, are available on Law.com. In the past, the company mostly hired lawyers with four to eight years of law firm experience. Now IBM increasingly hires straight out...</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Law students rejoice &#8211; the IBM legal department is hiring straight out of law school &#8211; and half its lawyers are outside of the US.  Could a law student start their career in a sunny tropical locale?</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/TfzN/~3/YCp_2X5wm74/ibm-hires-straight-from-law-school-and-locates-half-its-lawyers-outside-the-us.html" title="IBM hires straight from law school and locates half its lawyers outside the U.S.">IBM hires straight from law school and locates half its lawyers outside the U.S.</a> at the Law Department Management Blog]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/ibm_legal_department/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Legal Cost Containment &#8211; No Payment for Work by 1st Years</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/legal_cost_containment/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/legal_cost_containment/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:33:23 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biglaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cost Containment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=16884</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Corporate legal departments are beginning to take a hard line on costs these days, and one of the first places they’re cracking down is in paying for the high hourly costs of first- and second-year law firm associates.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Legal cost containment doesn&#8217;t just mean giving your in-house team more work:</p><p>Corporate legal departments are beginning to take a hard line on costs these days, and one of the first places they’re cracking down is in paying for the high hourly costs of first- and second-year law firm associates.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/6-IP_ri7u7k/corporate-legal-departments-refusing-to-pay-for-wo" title="Corporate legal departments refusing to pay for work by first-year associates">Corporate legal departments refusing to pay for work by first-year associates</a> at InsideCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/legal_cost_containment/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Most Popular Document Management Systems in Large Legal Departments</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/document_management_systems/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/document_management_systems/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:30:27 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Legal Technology]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=16557</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>ILTA’s 2011 Law Department Technology Survey gathered data in December 2010 on the document management systems used by 54 responding companies. Tops was Autonomy iManage/Interwoven with 15 users (27% of the DMS users), followed by Microsoft Sharepoint (14 users). The...</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>What are the most popular document management systems in large legal departments? Head over to Rees Morrison&#8217;s LawDepartmentManagementBlog for the answer.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/TfzN/~3/vAi4kO75oLo/most-cited-document-management-systems-dmss-in-large-legal-departments.html" title="Most-cited document management systems (DMSs) in large legal departments">Most-cited document management systems (DMSs) in large legal departments</a> at the Law Department Management Blog]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/document_management_systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>5 tips to maximize insurance coverage for legal fees</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/insurance_coverage_for_legal_fees/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/insurance_coverage_for_legal_fees/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:29:44 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=16553</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Knowing your insurer’s defense duty can help increase the value of their insurance.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Knowing your insurer’s defense duty can help increase the value of their insurance.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/07bPGHSXK9c/5-tips-to-maximize-insurance-coverage-for-legal-fe" title="5 tips to maximize insurance coverage for legal fees">5 tips to maximize insurance coverage for legal fees</a> at InsideCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/insurance_coverage_for_legal_fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Legal Department Spending Increases 6% at Expense of BigLaw</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/legal_department_spending/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/legal_department_spending/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:21:10 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biglaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=16259</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>While companies worldwide are spending more on legal services, outside counsel aren’t being shown the money. Companies spent 6 percent more on their own in-house legal departments in 2010, up from 1 percent in 2009, and decreased the amount spent on outside lawyers by 3 percent in the same year, according to a recent survey of law departments by Chicago-based HBR Consulting. “Law departments are recognizing that they can do more with less by building up their in-house capabilities,” said Lauren Chung, senior director and survey editor in a press release (PDF) for the 2011 HBR Law Department Survey. According…</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Legal department spending is on the rise &#8211; at the expense of BigLaw.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/abajournal/topstories/~3/_hMc6UC5p_0/" title="Corporate Legal Department Spend Increases 6% as Clients Boost In-House Capabilities">Corporate Legal Department Spend Increases 6% as Clients Boost In-House Capabilities</a> at the ABA Journal]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/legal_department_spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Setting Reserves with Confidence</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/setting-reserves/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/setting-reserves/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:22:15 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Guest Contributor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=14609</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>by Peter N. Farley, Guest Contributor When companies set reserves, they may seek recommendations from in-house counsel and may rely heavily on those recommendations. The challenge for many in-house counsel is getting comfortable with the estimates (determined by the accounting department) that will be the basis for the amounts recorded on the financial statements, a [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>by <a
href="http://www.sutherland.com/lawyers/Detail.aspx?Attorney=2130&#038;service=46" title="Peter N. Farley of Sutherland" target="_blank">Peter N. Farley</a>, Guest Contributor</p><p>When companies set reserves, they may seek recommendations from in-house counsel and may rely heavily on those recommendations. The challenge for many in-house counsel is getting comfortable with the estimates (determined by the accounting department) that will be the basis for the amounts recorded on the financial statements, a process that can pose unique challenges.  To learn more about setting reserves, <a
href="http://www.sutherland.com/files/Publication/031e270a-e58f-4bda-a3ec-6b75b81dfafd/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/41a0b07f-2704-47ce-9487-6d6b284b5ad5/Setting-Reserves-With-Confidence.pdf" title="Setting Reserves with Confidence" target="_blank">read this article (PDF)</a> by <a
href="http://www.sutherland.com/lawyers/Detail.aspx?Attorney=2130&#038;service=46" title="Peter N. Farley of Sutherland" target="_blank">Peter N. Farley</a>, a member of <a
href="http://www.sutherland.com/" title="Sutherland Law Firm" target="_blank">Sutherland’s</a> Litigation Practice Group. Previously, Peter served as General Counsel for Beaulieu Group, LLC where he managed litigation, complex federal tax and product defect matters as well as the ethics, compliance and internal audit functions. Peter continues to serve as Beaulieu&#8217;s outside general counsel as a partner with Sutherland.</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/setting-reserves/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Law Department Diversity: A Slower Advance</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_department_diversity/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_department_diversity/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 18:41:11 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Diversity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=14175</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Female attorneys haven't progressed as well in recent years as they did in earlier decades. But progress, or lack of it, isn't equal: Have women done better in-house?</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Female attorneys haven&#8217;t progressed as well in recent years as they did in earlier decades. But progress, or lack of it, isn&#8217;t equal: Have women done better in-house? Read on at CorpCounsel for news on law department diversity.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202517028168&amp;rss=cc" title="Diversity Digest: A Slower Advance">Diversity Digest: A Slower Advance</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_department_diversity/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Prosecutors Are Getting In-House Lawyers&#8217; Attention</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/inhouse-lawyers-at-risk/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/inhouse-lawyers-at-risk/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 13:24:41 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=14309</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Even without convictions, several high-profile prosecutions of in-house counsel are giving law departments plenty to ponder.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Even without convictions, several high-profile prosecutions of in-house counsel are giving law departments plenty to ponder.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202517141879&amp;rss=cc" title="Prosecutors Are Getting In-House Lawyers' Attention">Prosecutors Are Getting In-House Lawyers' Attention</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/inhouse-lawyers-at-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Top Ten Tips for Leveraging Legal Research Technology to Control Legal Costs</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/containing_costs_with_legal_research_technology/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/containing_costs_with_legal_research_technology/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:17:54 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Association of Corporate Counsel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cost Containment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Legal Technology]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=12687</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Looking for cost containment tips? Every legal department should be &#8211; here are some tips to leverage legal research technology to contain costs. Lydia Flocchini of Thomson Reuters (home of WestLawNext) has some related tips in an article at the Association of Corporate Counsel: In this ever-changing and leaner economic environment, corporate legal departments expect [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Looking for cost containment tips? Every legal department should be &#8211; here are some tips to leverage legal research technology to contain costs.  Lydia Flocchini of Thomson Reuters (home of WestLawNext) has some related tips in an article at the Association of Corporate Counsel:</p><blockquote><p>In this ever-changing and leaner economic environment, corporate legal departments expect outside counsel to deliver more effective and efficient legal services at a lower cost. Simultaneously, in-house counsel are investigating expense management initiatives as well as solutions for increasing efficiency and productivity. One way both are achieving these goals is by leveraging cutting-edge legal research technology.</p></blockquote><p>[via <a
href='http://www.acc.com/legalresources/publications/topten/Technology-for-Controling-Costs.cfm'>Top Ten Tips for Leveraging Cutting-Edge Legal Research Technology to Control Legal Costs and Drive Client Value - Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC)</a>]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/containing_costs_with_legal_research_technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Law Departments and The On-Boarding Process</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_departments_and_on-boarding/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_departments_and_on-boarding/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:18:40 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=12306</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p> Two comments from folks who recently moved in-house prompt this post. The first comment came from a guy who spent more than ten years with an Am Law 100 firm before moving in-house: “When I was reading the newspaper on Sunday, I realized something. Before I moved in-house, I never truly understood ‘Dilbert’ and the cubicle culture. Now, I do.” The second comment came from a guy who spent more than 20 years with two different AmLaw 100 firms before moving in-house: “When I moved laterally between law firms, my new firm understood that my time had value. I arrived at 9 on the first day and was working on client matters before noon.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Law departments, you better have a solid on-boarding process for new in-house hires as Mark Hermann points out at his recent InsideStraight column over at AboveTheLaw.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/abovethelaw/~3/X1YImkg-2SE/" title="Inside Straight: The On-Boarding Process">Inside Straight: The On-Boarding Process</a> at Above The Law]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/law_departments_and_on-boarding/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Interviewing To Retain Outside Counsel</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/retaining_outside_counsel/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/retaining_outside_counsel/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:42:28 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=11383</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p> Your company was just named in a new complaint, and there’s no obvious choice of counsel to defend you. What do you do? You ask around internally to see whether any of our lawyers has worked with good counsel in the jurisdiction. Perhaps you ask a trusted outside lawyer or two for recommendations. You narrow the choices down to two or three candidates, and you decide to interview the top three firms.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Looking to retain outside counsel? Hear the insights of Mark Hermann (the Vice President and Chief Counsel – Litigation at Aon) on the process at his <em>InsideStraight</em> column over at <em>AboveTheLaw</em>.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/abovethelaw/~3/3XtsJir3h_I/" title="Inside Straight: Interviewing To Retain Outside Counsel">Inside Straight: Interviewing To Retain Outside Counsel</a> at Above The Law]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/retaining_outside_counsel/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Company CEOs are key decision-makers in selecting outside counsel, not in-house counsel</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/outside_counsel_selection/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/outside_counsel_selection/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:42:19 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=10955</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p> “Much of my time and our marketing and sales effort over the past decade have been wasted through concentrating on the wrong people.” That was the stunned reaction of one law firm leader on learning that the client chief executive officer (CEO) or chair is primarily responsible for a massive 82% of law firm appointments for organisations with sales up to $500m (£303m), according to a recent Managing Partners’ Forum (MPF) survey. This compares with just 6% of organisations where such appointments are the responsibility of general counsel.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Step aside in-house counsel, the outside counsel selection decisions are apparently being made higher up:</p><p> “Much of my time and our marketing and sales effort over the past decade have been wasted through concentrating on the wrong people.” That was the stunned reaction of one law firm leader on learning that the client chief executive officer (CEO) or chair is primarily responsible for a massive 82% of law firm appointments for organisations with sales up to $500m (£303m), according to a recent Managing Partners’ Forum (MPF) survey. This compares with just 6% of organisations where such appointments are the responsibility of general counsel.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.legalweek.com/legal-week/analysis/2107209/company-ceos-key-decision-makers-appointing-law-firms-house-counsel?WT.rss_f=&amp;WT.rss_a=Company+CEOs+are+key+decision-makers+in+selecting+law+firms%2C+not+in-house+counsel" title="Company CEOs are key decision-makers in selecting law firms, not in-house counsel">Company CEOs are key decision-makers in selecting law firms, not in-house counsel</a> at LegalWeek]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/outside_counsel_selection/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
