<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>InhouseBlog.com &#187; IT/Software/Internet</title> <atom:link href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/tag/itsoftwareinternet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com</link> <description>In-House Counsel News and Jobs Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:54:48 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>Open Source Software &#8211; Risks, Use and Compliance (Free CLE Event from PLC, Feb. 22, 2012)</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/open_source_software_free_cle_event/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/open_source_software_free_cle_event/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:23:27 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Events]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=23418</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Open Source Software (&#8220;OSS&#8221;) is currently pervasive in its use for companies both large and small. Businesses use OSS to develop software rapidly and effectively, whether for their internal systems or for customer-facing products. Although OSS is obtained at no charge, there are significant risks in its usage because if the OSS is not integrated [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Open Source Software (&#8220;OSS&#8221;) is currently pervasive in its use for companies both large and small. Businesses use OSS to develop software rapidly and effectively, whether for their internal systems or for customer-facing products. Although OSS is obtained at no charge, there are significant risks in its usage because if the OSS is not integrated properly into existing systems, it can &#8220;infect&#8221; proprietary software, and a company is at risk of losing significant ownership value. <span
id="more-23418"></span>This program will address the following:</p><p>How is OSS licensed?</p><p>Risks in use of OSS.</p><p>Procedures to use when introducing OSS into a company&#8217;s systems.</p><p>How to develop an OSS Compliance Policy.</p><p>Documenting OSS usage.</p><p>OSS due diligence and representations in mergers, acquisitions and transfers of software assets.</p><p>Attendees of the live webinar may receive CLE credit for the following states: CA, IL and NY.*</p><p>Date: Wednesday, February 22, 2012</p><p>Time: 1:00pm- 2:00pm ET (10:00am &#8211; 11:00am PT)</p><p>Cost: Free</p><p>Speakers:<br
/> Christopher Palestro<br
/> Director and Managing Counsel of IP Transactions<br
/> Hewlett-Packard</p><p>Richard Raysman<br
/> Holland &#038; Knight LLP</p><p>Jeffrey R. Seul<br
/> Holland &#038; Knight LLP</p><p>Paul Connuck (Moderator)<br
/> IP &#038; IT Editor<br
/> Practical Law Company</p><p>*CLE credit for this program will be sought by Holland &#038; Knight, which is an approved CLE provider in Illinois, New York and California. For New York attorneys, the webinar format will not qualify for CLE credit for transitional (newly admitted) attorneys. CLE credit will be available for experienced New York attorneys.</p><p>To register, <a
href="https://event.on24.com/eventRegistration/EventLobbyServlet?target=registration.jsp&#038;eventid=395925&#038;sessionid=1&#038;key=361F4495F187733C47C5A4819D27109E&#038;partnerref=inhouseblog&#038;sourcepage=register" title="Open Source Software - Free CLE Event" target="_blank">visit the registration page today</a>.</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/open_source_software_free_cle_event/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Are E.U. and Google Data Policies the Future of Online Privacy?</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/online_privacy/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/online_privacy/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:14:20 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Data and Privacy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=22779</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>This week, the European Union proposed an overhaul of its data protection law, and Google announced a new privacy policy for its users. And the FTC and Department of Commerce are getting ready to join this global chorus on data privacy.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Online privacy issues on the march:</p><blockquote><p>This week, the European Union proposed an overhaul of its data protection law, and Google announced a new privacy policy for its users. And the FTC and Department of Commerce are getting ready to join this global chorus on data privacy.</p></blockquote><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202540189912&amp;rss=cc" title="Are E.U. and Google Data Policies the Future of Online Privacy?">Are E.U. and Google Data Policies the Future of Online Privacy?</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/online_privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Megaupload.com accused of massive copyright infringement</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/megaupload/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/megaupload/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:00:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=22419</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>With the flavor of the week being SOPA, PIPA and IP issues, it should come as little surprise that the Department of Justice is cracking down on a major content hosting website.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>With the flavor of the week being SOPA, PIPA and IP issues, it should come as little surprise that the Department of Justice is cracking down on a major content hosting website &#8211; MegaUpload.com.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/y5uyGGnup5w/megauploadcom-accused-of-massive-copyright-infring" title="Megaupload.com accused of massive copyright infringement">Megaupload.com accused of massive copyright infringement</a> at InsideCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/megaupload/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>How to protect your trade secrets in facilities abroad</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/trade_secrets/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/trade_secrets/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 10:02:26 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=21455</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Companies must put reasonable measures in place to maintain secrecy</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>A recent InsideCounsel article advises companies to put reasonable measures in place to maintain secrecy of their trade secrets in facilities abroad.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/X2onuyct_d0/how-to-protect-your-trade-secrets-in-facilities-ab" title="How to protect your trade secrets in facilities abroad">How to protect your trade secrets in facilities abroad</a> at InsideCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/trade_secrets/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Computer Fraud and Abuse Act 101</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/computer_fraud_and_abuse_act/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/computer_fraud_and_abuse_act/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 09:15:15 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Data and Privacy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=21542</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Lawyers should have a basic understanding of the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which provides criminal and civil penalties for wrongfully accessing a computer to do harmful things. They also should understand how to allege a loss under CFAA in a business case, which is not straightforward.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Want to learn more about the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act? Shawn E. Tuma&#8217;s article at CorpCounsel can help you get up to speed:</p><blockquote><p>Lawyers should have a basic understanding of the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which provides criminal and civil penalties for wrongfully accessing a computer to do harmful things. They also should understand how to allege a loss under CFAA in a business case, which is not straightforward.</p></blockquote><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202537182389&amp;rss=cc" title="Computer Fraud and Abuse Act 101">Computer Fraud and Abuse Act 101</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/computer_fraud_and_abuse_act/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Chamber of Commerce Cyber Attack a Wake-Up Call for In-House Counsel</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/cyber_attack/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/cyber_attack/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:29:46 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Data and Privacy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=21219</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>The extent of the cyber-damage caused by China-based hackers who tapped into the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in 2010 is not yet known, but the message to in-house counsel is clear: protect yourselves, right now.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The extent of the cyber attack damage caused by China-based hackers who tapped into the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in 2010 is not yet known, but the message to in-house counsel is clear: protect yourselves, right now.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202536537244&amp;rss=cc" title="Chamber of Commerce Cyber Attack a Wake-Up Call for In-House Counsel">Chamber of Commerce Cyber Attack a Wake-Up Call for In-House Counsel</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/cyber_attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>New iPhone app for PACER</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/iphone_app_for_pacer/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/iphone_app_for_pacer/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:14:15 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=21038</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Just in time for the holidays, the latest technological wizardry to hit Apple’s App Store is likely going to be the top gift idea for every attorney on your shopping list, and the perfect complement to their mobile computing needs.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Ho ho ho &#8211; an iPhone app for PACER:</p><blockquote><p>Just in time for the holidays, the latest technological wizardry to hit Apple’s App Store is likely going to be the top gift idea for every attorney on your shopping list, and the perfect complement to their mobile computing needs.</p></blockquote><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/zb4kdoPbH60/new-iphone-app-for-pacer" title="New iPhone app for PACER">New iPhone app for PACER</a> at InsideCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/iphone_app_for_pacer/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Preparing In-House Counsel for a New Year of Cybersecurity Threats</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/cybersecurity_threats/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/cybersecurity_threats/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:30:14 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=20818</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>This has been a big year for cyber attacks on company networks and corporate data breaches involving sensitive customer information. In-house lawyers need to stay ahead of these evolving issues for 2012.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>This has been a big year for cyber attacks on company networks and corporate data breaches involving sensitive customer information. In-house lawyers need to stay ahead of these evolving issues for 2012 and prepare for advanced cybersecurity threats.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202535770911&amp;rss=cc" title="Preparing In-House Counsel for a New Year of Cybersecurity Threats">Preparing In-House Counsel for a New Year of Cybersecurity Threats</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/cybersecurity_threats/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Facebook Settles Privacy Complaint by FTC</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/privacy_complaint/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/privacy_complaint/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:39:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Data and Privacy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=19693</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Facebook has agreed to submit to privacy audits and to warn users about privacy changes as part of a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission. The deal settles an FTC complaint that alleged Facebook deceived consumers by asserting their information would be private, then making it public, according to CNNMoney, the Los Angeles Times' Technology blog and Reuters. Now Facebook will have to give consumers prominent notice of changes and get consent before changing privacy settings. The company will also have to undergo privacy audits every two years for the next 20 years. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg says in a…</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Facebook has agreed to submit to privacy audits and to warn users about privacy changes as part of a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/abajournal/topstories/~3/2Yp1XisQnr4/" title="Facebook Settles Privacy Complaint by FTC; Two Lawyers Will Oversee Efforts">Facebook Settles Privacy Complaint by FTC; Two Lawyers Will Oversee Efforts</a> at the ABA Journal]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/privacy_complaint/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>IP: 3 strategies for beating patent trolls</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/beating_patent_trolls/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/beating_patent_trolls/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:24:04 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=19373</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>These tips can help companies efficiently manage their defense.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Tips courtesy of InsideCounsel intended to help companies efficiently manage their defense against pernicious patent trolls.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/apsSKd2JzIM/ip-3-strategies-for-beating-patent-trolls" title="IP: 3 strategies for beating patent trolls">IP: 3 strategies for beating patent trolls</a> at InsideCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/beating_patent_trolls/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Google&#8217;s Patent Counsel on the Ongoing Tech-Patent Wars</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/patent_wars/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/patent_wars/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:51:40 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=18495</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>In a recent interview, Google patent counsel Tim Porter discusses the ongoing patent spats over its Android smartphone operating system, which has led to sparring between the web-search giant and such industry heavyweights as Apple and Microsoft.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>In a recent interview, Google patent counsel Tim Porter discusses the ongoing patent wars over its Android smartphone operating system, which has led to sparring between the web-search giant and such industry heavyweights as Apple and Microsoft.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202528341178&amp;rss=cc" title="Google's Patent Counsel on the Ongoing Tech-Patent Wars">Google's Patent Counsel on the Ongoing Tech-Patent Wars</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/patent_wars/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>U.S. Businesses See Increase in Cyberattacks by Russia, China</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/cyberattacks/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/cyberattacks/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 09:30:11 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Law.com</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Data and Privacy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=18418</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Overseas electronic economic espionage and the plundering of trade secrets via cyberspace are the subjects of a U.S. government report by the Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>What is your legal department doing to protect your company&#8217;s data, information and assets?</p><blockquote><p>Overseas electronic economic espionage and the plundering of trade secrets via cyberattacks are the subjects of a U.S. government report by the Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive.</p></blockquote><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202525004831&amp;rss=cc" title="U.S. Businesses See Uptick in Cyberattacks by Russia, China">U.S. Businesses See Uptick in Cyberattacks by Russia, China</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/cyberattacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Data Security Is Top Concern in Annual Law Firm Technology Survey</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/data_security/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/data_security/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:16:21 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Law.com</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Data and Privacy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=18108</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Although the struggling recovery must still be reckoned with, feedback from the technology chiefs who responded to American Lawyer's annual survey on law firm technology and follow-up interviews with nearly a dozen of them reveal that the main focus has moved from dollars to data. The key issue: How do firms make information accessible to their lawyers without making it too accessible?</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Data security and availability are top on the minds of law firm technology chiefs &#8211; is your law firm keeping your data safe? Maybe it is time to ask.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/law/sign_me_in.jsp?article=http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202520992884&amp;rss=newswire" title="Security Is Top Concern in Annual Law Firm Technology Survey">Security Is Top Concern in Annual Law Firm Technology Survey</a> at Law.com]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/data_security/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>SEC asks companies to disclose cyber attacks</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/cyber_attacks/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/cyber_attacks/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:47:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=16885</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has asked public companies to disclose any cyber attacks against them.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has asked public companies to disclose any cyber attacks against them.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/PU6sPNkZYVk/sec-asks-companies-to-disclose-cyber-attacks" title="SEC asks companies to disclose cyber attacks">SEC asks companies to disclose cyber attacks</a> at InsideCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/cyber_attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Class of 2011: TLDs</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/top_level_domains/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/top_level_domains/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 09:27:39 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=13783</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>The fourth and final in a series of columns exploring the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, circa 2011: The cloud; data security in the new world of recreational hacking; IPv6; and the new rules for TLDs, a quartet that keeps in-house lawyers awake at night.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The fourth and final in a series of columns exploring the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, circa 2011: The cloud; data security in the new world of recreational hacking; IPv6; and the new rules for top level domains, a quartet that keeps in-house lawyers awake at night.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202517153410&amp;rss=cc" title="The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Class of 2011: TLDs">The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Class of 2011: TLDs</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/top_level_domains/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Net neutrality rules finally published</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/net_neutrality_rules/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/net_neutrality_rules/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:56:49 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=12699</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>In a move that will almost assuredly spur a spate of legal challenges that will clog courtrooms almost as much as wireless Internet providers have been slowing down network connections, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) finally published its long-awaited and hotly debated rules for Internet traffic.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) finally published its long-awaited and hotly debated net neutrality rules.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/REnVBSs0qLw/net-neutrality-rules-finally-published" title="Net neutrality rules finally published">Net neutrality rules finally published</a> at InsideCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/net_neutrality_rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Class of 2011: IPv6</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/horsemen-apocalypse-class-2011-ipv6/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/horsemen-apocalypse-class-2011-ipv6/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 08:53:20 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=8419</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>The third in a series of columns exploring the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, circa 2011: The cloud; data security in the new world of recreational hacking; IPv6; and the new rules for gTLDs, a quartet that keeps in-house lawyers awake at night.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The third in a series of columns exploring the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, circa 2011: The cloud; data security in the new world of recreational hacking; IPv6; and the new rules for gTLDs, a quartet that keeps in-house lawyers awake at night.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202513166091&amp;rss=cc" title="The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Class of 2011: IPv6">The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Class of 2011: IPv6</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/horsemen-apocalypse-class-2011-ipv6/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Ruling Leaves Silicon Valley Lawyers Wondering Whether &#8216;Practicality&#8217; Means &#8216;Patentable&#8217;</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/ruling_leaves_silicon_valley_lawyers_wondering_whether_practicality_means_patentable/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/ruling_leaves_silicon_valley_lawyers_wondering_whether_practicality_means_patentable/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:25:44 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=7836</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling in CyberSource v. Retail Decisions leaves room for debate about what kinds of business methods can be patented, thanks to one word: practicality.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling in CyberSource v. Retail Decisions leaves room for debate about what kinds of business methods can be patented, thanks to one word: practicality.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202512708124&amp;rss=cc" title="Ruling Leaves Silicon Valley Lawyers Wondering Whether 'Practicality' Means 'Patentable'">Ruling Leaves Silicon Valley Lawyers Wondering Whether 'Practicality' Means 'Patentable'</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/ruling_leaves_silicon_valley_lawyers_wondering_whether_practicality_means_patentable/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>&#8216;Original Patent Troll&#8217; is Back After Long Hiatus, With a New Name and New Patents</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/original-patent-troll-long-hiatus-patents/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/original-patent-troll-long-hiatus-patents/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 08:02:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=6423</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Anthony Brown, CEO of a new non-practicing entity called Cascades Ventures, is the man who inspired former Intel in-house lawyer Peter Detkin to coin the term "patent troll" a decade ago, referring to Brown, his company TechSearch, and their lawyer, Raymond Niro.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Anthony Brown, CEO of a new non-practicing entity called Cascades Ventures, is the man who inspired former Intel in-house lawyer Peter Detkin to coin the term &#8220;patent troll&#8221; a decade ago, referring to Brown, his company TechSearch, and their lawyer, Raymond Niro.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202511464195&amp;rss=cc" title="'Original Patent Troll' is Back After Long Hiatus, With a New Name and New Patents">'Original Patent Troll' is Back After Long Hiatus, With a New Name and New Patents</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/original-patent-troll-long-hiatus-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Investigating Personal Web-Based E-Mail</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/investigating-personal-webbased-email/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/investigating-personal-webbased-email/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=965</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>You suspect an employee is leaking inside information. An investigation reveals that the employee accessed a personal Web-based e-mail account from a company computer and that the login information has been recovered. Can you log into that account and read its e-mail content? Read all about it at Legal Technology &#8211; Investigating Personal Web-Based E [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>You suspect an employee is leaking inside information. An investigation reveals that the employee accessed a personal Web-based e-mail account from a company computer and that the login information has been recovered. Can you log into that account and read its e-mail content?</p><p>Read all about it at <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/pubArticleLT.jsp?id=1202431767784&#038;rss=ltn">Legal Technology &#8211; Investigating Personal Web-Based E Mail </a>.</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/investigating-personal-webbased-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>How Ready Is Your Company to Respond to a Data Breach?</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/how_ready_is_your_company_to_respond_to_a_data_breach/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/how_ready_is_your_company_to_respond_to_a_data_breach/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:38:16 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Law.com</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Data and Privacy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/2008/07/how_ready_is_your_company_to_respond_to_a_data_breach.html</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Everyone is grappling with self-reported data spills. Organizations of every size, public and private, here and abroad, are feeling the fast-paced, disruptive economic sting of an unauthorized sensitive information leak. Attorney Harry A. Valetk says in-house counsel should plan ahead and think about how to respond before an incident occurs. With this in mind, Valetk [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Everyone is grappling with self-reported data spills. Organizations of every size, public and private, here and abroad, are feeling the fast-paced, disruptive economic sting of an unauthorized sensitive information leak. Attorney Harry A. Valetk says in-house counsel should plan ahead and think about how to respond before an incident occurs. With this in mind, Valetk provides five key questions to test your company&#8217;s readiness to respond swiftly and effectively in case a data breach occurs.</p><p><a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/ihc/PubArticleIHC.jsp?id=1202422861742&#038;rss=ihc">How Ready Is Your Company to Respond to a Data Breach?</a></p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/how_ready_is_your_company_to_respond_to_a_data_breach/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>N.Y. Law Firm Bans BlackBerrys at Major Meetings</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/ny_law_firm_bans_blackberrys_at_major_meetings/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/ny_law_firm_bans_blackberrys_at_major_meetings/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:31:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/2008/04/ny_law_firm_bans_blackberrys_at_major_meetings.html</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Next thing you know they&#8217;ll ban PlayStation Portables&#8230; N.Y. Law Firm Bans BlackBerrys at Major Meetings &#124; ABA Journal &#8211; Law News Now Like this post? Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Next thing you know they&#8217;ll ban PlayStation Portables&#8230;</p><p><a
href="http://www.abajournal.com/news/ny_law_firm_bans_blackberrys_at_major_meetings/#When:10:56:00Z">N.Y. Law Firm Bans BlackBerrys at Major Meetings | ABA Journal &#8211; Law News Now</a></p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/ny_law_firm_bans_blackberrys_at_major_meetings/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Eight Legal Technology Trends for 2008 – Good Times, Bad Times or Hard Times in Legal Tech? &#124; LLRX.com</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/eight_legal_technology_trends_for_2008_good_times_bad_times_or_hard_times_in_legal_tech_llrxcom/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/eight_legal_technology_trends_for_2008_good_times_bad_times_or_hard_times_in_legal_tech_llrxcom/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:05:45 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Legal Technology]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/2008/03/eight_legal_technology_trends_for_2008_good_times_bad_times_or_hard_times_in_legal_tech_llrxcom.html</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Legal tech guru Dennis Kennedy shares his thoughts on legal tech trends for 2008 &#8211; read and share with your law department and MIS department. Eight Legal Technology Trends for 2008 – Good Times, Bad Times or Hard Times in Legal Tech? &#124; LLRX.com Like this post? Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter. Unsubscribe [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Legal tech guru Dennis Kennedy shares his thoughts on legal tech trends for 2008 &#8211; read and share with your law department and MIS department.</p><p><a
href="http://www.llrx.com/features/techtrends2008.htm">Eight Legal Technology Trends for 2008 – Good Times, Bad Times or Hard Times in Legal Tech? | LLRX.com</a></p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/eight_legal_technology_trends_for_2008_good_times_bad_times_or_hard_times_in_legal_tech_llrxcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>2008 Corporate Legal Technology Trends</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/2008_corporate_legal_technology_trends_/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/2008_corporate_legal_technology_trends_/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:38:22 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Legal Technology]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/2008/02/2008_corporate_legal_technology_trends_.html</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Did you miss LegalTech? Read about what consultant Jeffrey Beard saw on his recent trip to the popular convention over at InsideCounsel.   From e-discovery to automated document review, there is plenty of information that will help you embrace your inner nerd. 2008 Corporate Legal Technology Trends &#8211; InsideCounsel Like this post? Subscribe to InhouseBlog's [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Did you miss LegalTech?  Read about what consultant Jeffrey Beard saw on his recent trip to the popular convention over at <em>InsideCounsel</em>.   From e-discovery to automated document review, there is plenty of information that will help you embrace your inner nerd.</p><p><a
href="http://www.insidecounsel.com/section/technology/1651">2008 Corporate Legal Technology Trends &#8211; InsideCounsel</a></p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/2008_corporate_legal_technology_trends_/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Top Cyberlaw Developments of 2007</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/top_cyberlaw_developments_of_2007/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/top_cyberlaw_developments_of_2007/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:01:31 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/2008/01/top_cyberlaw_developments_of_2007.html</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Eric Goldman has done it again &#8211; released his annual recap of cyberlaw developments.  Head over to his excellent Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog for the full details. Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog: Top Cyberlaw Developments of 2007 Like this post? Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Eric Goldman has done it again &#8211; released his annual recap of cyberlaw developments.  Head over to his excellent Technology &amp; Marketing Law Blog for the full details.</p><p><a
href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2008/01/top_cyberlaw_de_2.htm">Technology &amp; Marketing Law Blog: Top Cyberlaw Developments of 2007</a></p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/top_cyberlaw_developments_of_2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Technology brings longer hours but corporate lawyers like it</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/technology_brings_longer_hours_but_corporate_lawyers_like_it/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/technology_brings_longer_hours_but_corporate_lawyers_like_it/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 06:48:10 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/2007/11/technology_brings_longer_hours_but_corporate_lawyers_like_it.html</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>You know what they say about surveys&#8230;. A survey of 115 in-house lawyers at multinational firms said technology made their working life more satisfying despite the longer hours, as many were allowed to work from home. The survey was carried out by law firm Kemp Little LLP and the PLC Law Department magazine. The majority [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>You know what they say about surveys&#8230;.</p><blockquote><p>A survey of 115 in-house lawyers at multinational firms said technology made their working life more satisfying despite the longer hours, as many were allowed to work from home.</p></blockquote><blockquote><p>The survey was carried out by law firm Kemp Little LLP and the PLC Law Department magazine.</p><p>The majority of respondents 56.1% said that technology had led to longer working hours. But 46.5% said that their working lives are more satisfying.</p></blockquote><p><a
href="http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2007/11/13/228069/technology-brings-longer-hours-but-corporate-lawyers-like.htm">Technology brings longer hours but corporate lawyers like it</a></p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/technology_brings_longer_hours_but_corporate_lawyers_like_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Chief Legal Officers Putting High Priority on Records and Information Management Compliance Programs for 2008</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/chief_legal_officers_putting_high_priority_on_records_and_information_management_compliance_programs_for_2008/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/chief_legal_officers_putting_high_priority_on_records_and_information_management_compliance_programs_for_2008/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:11:17 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/2007/11/chief_legal_officers_putting_high_priority_on_records_and_information_management_compliance_programs_for_2008.html</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not too early to start thinking about resolutions for the New Year &#8211; and one good one may be improving records and information management practices, as a recent survey of Chief Legal Officers indicates.   If you&#8217;re interested in these topics, head over to Rick Wolf&#8217;s The Datakos Blog, which was created to share [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>It&#8217;s not too early to start thinking about resolutions for the New Year &#8211; and one good one may be improving records and information management practices, as a recent survey of Chief Legal Officers indicates.   If you&#8217;re interested in these topics, head over to Rick Wolf&#8217;s <span
style="color: black"><a
href="http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/" title="The Datakos Blog" target="_blank"><em>The Datakos Blog</em></a>, which was created</span><span
lang="EN"> to share perspectives and news on the latest developments in corporate governance, compliance and ethics, e-discovery and records management policy development. Rick also covers client relationship management and law department challenges with litigation management.</span></p><p><a
href="http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/071101/0322807.html">Chief Legal Officers Putting High Priority on Records and Information Management Compliance Programs for 2008: Financial News &#8211; Yahoo Finance</a></p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/chief_legal_officers_putting_high_priority_on_records_and_information_management_compliance_programs_for_2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Open Source Lawsuits in the Works from Microsoft?</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/open_source_/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/open_source_/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 12:51:48 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/2007/05/open_source_.html</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>You can hear the gulps of CIOs and in-house IP attorneys around the country. According to an article in Fortune, Microsoft is weighing its options and may start enforcing its open source software related patents. Read more at The Wired GC. Did you get open source insurance from Lloyd&#8217;s? Like this post? Subscribe to InhouseBlog's [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>You can hear the gulps of CIOs and in-house IP attorneys around the country.  According to an article in <em>Fortune</em>, Microsoft is weighing its options and may start enforcing its open source software related patents. Read more at <a
href="http://www.wiredgc.com/2007/05/14/open-source-open-season/">The Wired GC</a>. Did you get <a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/2005/08/lloyds_to_offer.html">open source insurance from Lloyd&#8217;s</a>?</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/open_source_/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>GE Wins Award for Top Legal Department</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/ge_wins_award_for_top_legal_department/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/ge_wins_award_for_top_legal_department/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:52:27 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law Department Management]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/2007/04/ge_wins_award_for_top_legal_department.html</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>As the Wired GC reports, General Electric&#8217;s legal department has won Corporate Counsel&#8217;s award for the top legal department this year.  It sounds like GE has its act together on legal IT &#8211; they&#8217;ve effectively used technology to lower costs and get their jobs done more efficiently. The Wired GC » Blog Archive » GE [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>As the <a
href="http://www.wiredgc.com/" title="Wired GC" target="_blank"><em>Wired GC</em></a> reports, General Electric&#8217;s legal department has won <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/index.jsp" title="Corporate Counsel" target="_blank">Corporate Counsel&#8217;s</a> award for the top legal department this year.  It sounds like GE has its act together on legal IT &#8211; they&#8217;ve effectively used technology to lower costs and get their jobs done more efficiently.</p><p><a
href="http://www.wiredgc.com/2007/04/18/ge-legal-takes-the-lead/">The Wired GC » Blog Archive » GE Legal Takes the Lead</a></p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/ge_wins_award_for_top_legal_department/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>WIPO Warns Trademark Owners Of Increased Risk From Cybersquatters</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/wipo_warns_trademark_owners_of_increased_risk_from_cybersquatters/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/wipo_warns_trademark_owners_of_increased_risk_from_cybersquatters/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:35:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/2007/04/wipo_warns_trademark_owners_of_increased_risk_from_cybersquatters.html</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>A recent World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) report points out what many already know too well &#8211; domain name cybersquatting is still a significant risk to companies and the pernicious cybersquatters are only getting more savvy. Marc Trachtenberg of Ladas &#38; Parry LLP provides a review of recent developments and also gives useful suggestions for [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>A recent World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) report points out what many already know too well &#8211; domain name cybersquatting is still a significant risk to companies and the pernicious cybersquatters are only getting more savvy.  Marc Trachtenberg of Ladas &amp; Parry LLP provides a review of recent developments and also gives useful suggestions for reducing the risks &#8211; some of the suggestions include the following (Marc provides full details in the article):</p><ul><li>Perform a domain audit</li><li>Register Available Domains</li><li>Subscribe to a Domain Watch Service</li><li>Create an Enforcement Strategy</li><li>Have your trademarks removed from use as keywords by the major online advertising providers</li></ul><p><a
href="http://www.mondaq.com/i_article.asp_Q_articleid_E_47420_A_rss_E_0">WIPO Warns Trademark Owners Of Increased Risk From Cybersquatters from Mondaq (free registration required)</a></p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/wipo_warns_trademark_owners_of_increased_risk_from_cybersquatters/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
