<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>InhouseBlog.com &#187; Cyberlaw</title> <atom:link href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/tag/cyberlaw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com</link> <description>In-House Counsel News and Jobs Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:54:48 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>Open Source Software &#8211; Risks, Use and Compliance (Free CLE Event from PLC, Feb. 22, 2012)</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/open_source_software_free_cle_event/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/open_source_software_free_cle_event/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:23:27 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Events]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=23418</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Open Source Software (&#8220;OSS&#8221;) is currently pervasive in its use for companies both large and small. Businesses use OSS to develop software rapidly and effectively, whether for their internal systems or for customer-facing products. Although OSS is obtained at no charge, there are significant risks in its usage because if the OSS is not integrated [...]</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Open Source Software (&#8220;OSS&#8221;) is currently pervasive in its use for companies both large and small. Businesses use OSS to develop software rapidly and effectively, whether for their internal systems or for customer-facing products. Although OSS is obtained at no charge, there are significant risks in its usage because if the OSS is not integrated properly into existing systems, it can &#8220;infect&#8221; proprietary software, and a company is at risk of losing significant ownership value. <span
id="more-23418"></span>This program will address the following:</p><p>How is OSS licensed?</p><p>Risks in use of OSS.</p><p>Procedures to use when introducing OSS into a company&#8217;s systems.</p><p>How to develop an OSS Compliance Policy.</p><p>Documenting OSS usage.</p><p>OSS due diligence and representations in mergers, acquisitions and transfers of software assets.</p><p>Attendees of the live webinar may receive CLE credit for the following states: CA, IL and NY.*</p><p>Date: Wednesday, February 22, 2012</p><p>Time: 1:00pm- 2:00pm ET (10:00am &#8211; 11:00am PT)</p><p>Cost: Free</p><p>Speakers:<br
/> Christopher Palestro<br
/> Director and Managing Counsel of IP Transactions<br
/> Hewlett-Packard</p><p>Richard Raysman<br
/> Holland &#038; Knight LLP</p><p>Jeffrey R. Seul<br
/> Holland &#038; Knight LLP</p><p>Paul Connuck (Moderator)<br
/> IP &#038; IT Editor<br
/> Practical Law Company</p><p>*CLE credit for this program will be sought by Holland &#038; Knight, which is an approved CLE provider in Illinois, New York and California. For New York attorneys, the webinar format will not qualify for CLE credit for transitional (newly admitted) attorneys. CLE credit will be available for experienced New York attorneys.</p><p>To register, <a
href="https://event.on24.com/eventRegistration/EventLobbyServlet?target=registration.jsp&#038;eventid=395925&#038;sessionid=1&#038;key=361F4495F187733C47C5A4819D27109E&#038;partnerref=inhouseblog&#038;sourcepage=register" title="Open Source Software - Free CLE Event" target="_blank">visit the registration page today</a>.</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/open_source_software_free_cle_event/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Social media use among in-house lawyers on the upswing</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/social_media/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/social_media/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:48:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[In-House Life]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=22669</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>A new survey reveals that in-house lawyers of all ages are browsing blogs, looking at LinkedIn and toying with other social media platforms more frequently these days.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>A new survey reveals that in-house lawyers of all ages are browsing blogs, looking at LinkedIn and toying with other social media platforms more frequently these days.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/DzR3Hr91ePE/social-media-use-among-in-house-lawyers-on-the-ups" title="Social media use among in-house lawyers on the upswing">Social media use among in-house lawyers on the upswing</a> at InsideCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/social_media/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Megaupload.com accused of massive copyright infringement</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/megaupload/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/megaupload/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:00:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=22419</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>With the flavor of the week being SOPA, PIPA and IP issues, it should come as little surprise that the Department of Justice is cracking down on a major content hosting website.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>With the flavor of the week being SOPA, PIPA and IP issues, it should come as little surprise that the Department of Justice is cracking down on a major content hosting website &#8211; MegaUpload.com.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/y5uyGGnup5w/megauploadcom-accused-of-massive-copyright-infring" title="Megaupload.com accused of massive copyright infringement">Megaupload.com accused of massive copyright infringement</a> at InsideCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/megaupload/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>SEC asks companies to disclose cyber attacks</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/cyber_attacks/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/cyber_attacks/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:47:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=16885</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has asked public companies to disclose any cyber attacks against them.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has asked public companies to disclose any cyber attacks against them.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/PU6sPNkZYVk/sec-asks-companies-to-disclose-cyber-attacks" title="SEC asks companies to disclose cyber attacks">SEC asks companies to disclose cyber attacks</a> at InsideCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/cyber_attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>ECJ&#8217;s trademark infringement ruling affects online operators</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/ecj_trademark_ruling/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/ecj_trademark_ruling/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 10:04:42 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=14637</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Court considers liabilities in keyword advertising in L'Oreal v. eBay.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Court considers liabilities in keyword advertising in L&#8217;Oreal v. eBay.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/DcBVheqdagk/ecjs-trademark-infringement-ruling-affects-online" title="ECJ's trademark infringement ruling affects online operators">ECJ's trademark infringement ruling affects online operators</a> at InsideCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/ecj_trademark_ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Technology: Combatting employee misconduct</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/employee_misconduct/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/employee_misconduct/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:33:01 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=14213</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act is a popular, yet controversial mechanism to seek recovery.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act is a popular, yet controversial mechanism to seek recovery.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/AdGhP8BboFs/technology-combatting-employee-misconduct" title="Technology: Combatting employee misconduct">Technology: Combatting employee misconduct</a> at InsideCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/employee_misconduct/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Class of 2011: TLDs</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/top_level_domains/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/top_level_domains/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 09:27:39 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Risk Management & Compliance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=13783</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>The fourth and final in a series of columns exploring the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, circa 2011: The cloud; data security in the new world of recreational hacking; IPv6; and the new rules for TLDs, a quartet that keeps in-house lawyers awake at night.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The fourth and final in a series of columns exploring the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, circa 2011: The cloud; data security in the new world of recreational hacking; IPv6; and the new rules for top level domains, a quartet that keeps in-house lawyers awake at night.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202517153410&amp;rss=cc" title="The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Class of 2011: TLDs">The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Class of 2011: TLDs</a> at CorpCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/top_level_domains/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Net neutrality rules finally published</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/net_neutrality_rules/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/net_neutrality_rules/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:56:49 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/?p=12699</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>In a move that will almost assuredly spur a spate of legal challenges that will clog courtrooms almost as much as wireless Internet providers have been slowing down network connections, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) finally published its long-awaited and hotly debated rules for Internet traffic.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) finally published its long-awaited and hotly debated net neutrality rules.</p><p>[via: <a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/insidecounsel/~3/REnVBSs0qLw/net-neutrality-rules-finally-published" title="Net neutrality rules finally published">Net neutrality rules finally published</a> at InsideCounsel]</p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/net_neutrality_rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Top Cyberlaw Developments of 2007</title><link>http://www.inhouseblog.com/top_cyberlaw_developments_of_2007/</link> <comments>http://www.inhouseblog.com/top_cyberlaw_developments_of_2007/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:01:31 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT/Software/Internet]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhouseblog.com/2008/01/top_cyberlaw_developments_of_2007.html</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Eric Goldman has done it again &#8211; released his annual recap of cyberlaw developments.  Head over to his excellent Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog for the full details. Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog: Top Cyberlaw Developments of 2007 Like this post? Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.</p><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Eric Goldman has done it again &#8211; released his annual recap of cyberlaw developments.  Head over to his excellent Technology &amp; Marketing Law Blog for the full details.</p><p><a
href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2008/01/top_cyberlaw_de_2.htm">Technology &amp; Marketing Law Blog: Top Cyberlaw Developments of 2007</a></p><p>Like this post? <b><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com/subscribe">Subscribe to InhouseBlog's FREE weekly email newsletter.</a></b> Unsubscribe at any time.<span
id="pty_trigger"></span><p><a
href="http://www.inhouseblog.com">InhouseBlog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.inhouseblog.com/top_cyberlaw_developments_of_2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
