Filed In News

The Headquarter-Less Law Firm

by Editors on December 18, 2006

Peter Lattman at the WSJ Law Blog reports on the advent of law firms without headquarters – a by-product of the mega-mergers that have swept the legal services industry.  The question for in-house counsel is – do you care? What if law firms slowly migrated to the virtual workforce model and dispensed with offices altogether? Should wood-paneling manufacturers be nervous?

"One thing that stuck out in yesterday’s merger announcement of Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Nicholson Graham and Preston Gates & Ellis: The firms’ officials insisted that the firm would have no specific headquarters.

For the Law Blog and reporters who cover Big Law, we’re often faced with this interesting situation: law firms born in cities other than New York often find being associated with their hometowns anathema. Recently a partner in the New York office of Morgan Lewis & Bockius — a firm with Philadelphia roots — pleaded with us not to call Morgan Lewis a Philly-based firm."

Link: Law Blog – WSJ.com � The Headquarter-Less Law Firm.

Similar Posts:

  • What To Do If You Think Your Job Is In Peril
  • New BigLaw Job: Lend-an-Associate
  • Firms, Legal Departments Are ‘At War With Each Other’
  • Shearman Eliminates General Counsel Post
  • Board Oversight of Intellectual Property Is Increasingly Important
  • Leave a Comment

    Previous post: “A Palpably Ridiculous Definition of the Word ‘Review’”

    Next post: Do you have an “extreme” in-house job?