Grokster: The Supreme Court Has Spoken

    Head over to Boing Boing to read the latest and greatest about the Supreme Court’s decision in the MGM v. Grokster case.  The holding is short and sweet:  "We hold that one who distributes a device with the object of promoting
    its use to infringe copyright, as shown by clear expression or other
    affirmative steps taken to foster infringement, is liable for the
    resulting acts of infringement by third parties." You should also check out Cathy Kirkman’s post on the decision’s impact on the technology industry.

* Like this? Subscribe to this blog and get periodic updates of in-house counsel news and jobs. *

Related Posts:
Trademark Infringement and the Fair Use Defense
Boundary Flare-Up: The Supreme Court Revisits Constitutional Limitation on States’ Power to Tax
Corporate Officer Held Personally Liable For IP Infringement By His Company
The Supreme Court, Judge Roberts and Business
Intrade: Alito is the Next Supreme Court Nominee



Leave a Comment